On Thu, 4 Jan 2024 at 13:29, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 04, 2024 at 01:15:45AM -0600, Daniel Díaz wrote: > > Hello! > > > > On 03/01/24 10:10 p. m., Daniel Díaz wrote: > > > Hello! > > > > > > On 03/01/24 10:55 a. m., Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.6.10 release. > > > > There are 49 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > > > > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > > > > let me know. > > > > > > > > Responses should be made by Fri, 05 Jan 2024 16:47:49 +0000. > > > > Anything received after that time might be too late. > > > > > > > > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: > > > > https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.6.10-rc1.gz > > > > or in the git tree and branch at: > > > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.6.y > > > > and the diffstat can be found below. > > > > > > > > thanks, > > > > > > > > greg k-h > > > > > > We're seeing a build regression with x86/GCC-8 and allmodconfig: > > > > > > -----8<----- > > > In file included from /builds/linux/include/linux/string.h:294, > > > from /builds/linux/include/linux/bitmap.h:11, > > > from /builds/linux/include/linux/cpumask.h:12, > > > from /builds/linux/arch/x86/include/asm/paravirt.h:17, > > > from /builds/linux/arch/x86/include/asm/cpuid.h:62, > > > from /builds/linux/arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h:19, > > > from /builds/linux/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeature.h:5, > > > from /builds/linux/arch/x86/include/asm/thread_info.h:53, > > > from /builds/linux/include/linux/thread_info.h:60, > > > from /builds/linux/include/linux/uio.h:9, > > > from /builds/linux/include/linux/socket.h:8, > > > from /builds/linux/include/uapi/linux/if.h:25, > > > from /builds/linux/net/wireless/nl80211.c:11: > > > In function 'nl80211_set_cqm_rssi.isra.44', > > > inlined from 'nl80211_set_cqm' at /builds/linux/net/wireless/nl80211.c:13000:10: > > > /builds/linux/include/linux/fortify-string.h:57:29: error: '__builtin_memcpy' pointer overflow between offset 36 and size [-1, 9223372036854775807] [-Werror=array-bounds] > > > #define __underlying_memcpy __builtin_memcpy > > > ^ > > > /builds/linux/include/linux/fortify-string.h:648:2: note: in expansion of macro '__underlying_memcpy' > > > __underlying_##op(p, q, __fortify_size); \ > > > ^~~~~~~~~~~~~ > > > /builds/linux/include/linux/fortify-string.h:693:26: note: in expansion of macro '__fortify_memcpy_chk' > > > #define memcpy(p, q, s) __fortify_memcpy_chk(p, q, s, \ > > > ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > > > /builds/linux/net/wireless/nl80211.c:12939:3: note: in expansion of macro 'memcpy' > > > memcpy(cqm_config->rssi_thresholds, thresholds, > > > ^~~~~~ > > > cc1: all warnings being treated as errors > > > make[5]: *** [/builds/linux/scripts/Makefile.build:243: net/wireless/nl80211.o] Error 1 > > > ----->8----- > > > > > > This is currently being bisected, so there is more to follow. > > > > Bisection pointed to: > > > > commit 92045aab1bd9bfd73d816e907ea07739c4550b41 > > Author: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@xxxxxxxxx> > > Date: Sat Dec 16 05:47:15 2023 +0000 > > > > wifi: cfg80211: fix CQM for non-range use > > commit 7e7efdda6adb385fbdfd6f819d76bc68c923c394 upstream. > > > > Reverting that was not possible, so I reverted 47f3694a4259 first ("wifi: nl80211: fix deadlock in nl80211_set_cqm_rssi (6.6.x)"), but that was not enough. After reverting both 47f3694a4259 and 92045aab1bd9, the build passed again. > > > > Reproducer: > > > > tuxmake --runtime podman --target-arch x86_64 --toolchain gcc-8 --kconfig allmodconfig > > Very odd, 6.1 works fine with this same compiler? It works on 6.1 with the same compiler. > These changes were in > the 6.1.70 release (and the 6.1.66 release) before. > > It was also in 6.6.5, before being reverted in 6.6.6, so why is this > causing a problem now? It was also noticed on 6.6.5-rc1 git_describe: v6.6.4-135-gb0b05ccdd77d I have already reported this on a stable mailing list [1] on 6.6.5-rc1. Please find more details and comments from Arnd [2] and Kees [3]. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/stable/CA+G9fYuL_-Q67t+Y7ST5taYv1XkkoJegH2zBvw_ZUOhF9QRiOg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx/ [2] https://lore.kernel.org/stable/ce99918f-eb6a-4ad7-aa44-9d27c27b6b00@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/ [3] https://lore.kernel.org/all/202311301016.84D0010@keescook/ Test results comparison, https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-6.6.y/build/v6.6.9-50-g5fd1c89851c4/testrun/21921607/suite/build/test/gcc-8-allmodconfig/history/ - Naresh
