6.1-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Marios Makassikis <mmakassikis@xxxxxxxxxx>
[ Upstream commit 807252f028c59b9a3bac4d62ad84761548c10f11 ]
Running smb2.rename test from Samba smbtorture suite against a kernel built
with lockdep triggers a "possible recursive locking detected" warning.
This is because mnt_want_write() is called twice with no mnt_drop_write()
in between:
-> ksmbd_vfs_mkdir()
-> ksmbd_vfs_kern_path_create()
-> kern_path_create()
-> filename_create()
-> mnt_want_write()
-> mnt_want_write()
Fix this by removing the mnt_want_write/mnt_drop_write calls from vfs
helpers that call kern_path_create().
Full lockdep trace below:
============================================
WARNING: possible recursive locking detected
6.6.0-rc5 #775 Not tainted
--------------------------------------------
kworker/1:1/32 is trying to acquire lock:
ffff888005ac83f8 (sb_writers#5){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: ksmbd_vfs_mkdir+0xe1/0x410
but task is already holding lock:
ffff888005ac83f8 (sb_writers#5){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: filename_create+0xb6/0x260
other info that might help us debug this:
Possible unsafe locking scenario:
CPU0
----
lock(sb_writers#5);
lock(sb_writers#5);
*** DEADLOCK ***
May be due to missing lock nesting notation
4 locks held by kworker/1:1/32:
#0: ffff8880064e4138 ((wq_completion)ksmbd-io){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0x40e/0x980
#1: ffff888005b0fdd0 ((work_completion)(&work->work)){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0x40e/0x980
#2: ffff888005ac83f8 (sb_writers#5){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: filename_create+0xb6/0x260
#3: ffff8880057ce760 (&type->i_mutex_dir_key#3/1){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: filename_create+0x123/0x260
Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fixes: 40b268d384a2 ("ksmbd: add mnt_want_write to ksmbd vfs functions")
Signed-off-by: Marios Makassikis <mmakassikis@xxxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Namjae Jeon <linkinjeon@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Steve French <stfrench@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
fs/smb/server/vfs.c | 23 +++--------------------
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/smb/server/vfs.c b/fs/smb/server/vfs.c
index 071c344dd0333..e2e454eba4095 100644
--- a/fs/smb/server/vfs.c
+++ b/fs/smb/server/vfs.c
@@ -174,10 +174,6 @@ int ksmbd_vfs_create(struct ksmbd_work *work, const char *name, umode_t mode)
return err;
}
- err = mnt_want_write(path.mnt);
- if (err)
- goto out_err;
-
mode |= S_IFREG;
err = vfs_create(mnt_user_ns(path.mnt), d_inode(path.dentry),
dentry, mode, true);
@@ -187,9 +183,7 @@ int ksmbd_vfs_create(struct ksmbd_work *work, const char *name, umode_t mode)
} else {
pr_err("File(%s): creation failed (err:%d)\n", name, err);
}
- mnt_drop_write(path.mnt);
-out_err:
done_path_create(&path, dentry);
return err;
}
@@ -220,10 +214,6 @@ int ksmbd_vfs_mkdir(struct ksmbd_work *work, const char *name, umode_t mode)
return err;
}
- err = mnt_want_write(path.mnt);
- if (err)
- goto out_err2;
-
user_ns = mnt_user_ns(path.mnt);
mode |= S_IFDIR;
err = vfs_mkdir(user_ns, d_inode(path.dentry), dentry, mode);
@@ -234,21 +224,19 @@ int ksmbd_vfs_mkdir(struct ksmbd_work *work, const char *name, umode_t mode)
dentry->d_name.len);
if (IS_ERR(d)) {
err = PTR_ERR(d);
- goto out_err1;
+ goto out_err;
}
if (unlikely(d_is_negative(d))) {
dput(d);
err = -ENOENT;
- goto out_err1;
+ goto out_err;
}
ksmbd_vfs_inherit_owner(work, d_inode(path.dentry), d_inode(d));
dput(d);
}
-out_err1:
- mnt_drop_write(path.mnt);
-out_err2:
+out_err:
done_path_create(&path, dentry);
if (err)
pr_err("mkdir(%s): creation failed (err:%d)\n", name, err);
@@ -666,16 +654,11 @@ int ksmbd_vfs_link(struct ksmbd_work *work, const char *oldname,
goto out3;
}
- err = mnt_want_write(newpath.mnt);
- if (err)
- goto out3;
-
err = vfs_link(oldpath.dentry, mnt_user_ns(newpath.mnt),
d_inode(newpath.dentry),
dentry, NULL);
if (err)
ksmbd_debug(VFS, "vfs_link failed err %d\n", err);
- mnt_drop_write(newpath.mnt);
out3:
done_path_create(&newpath, dentry);
--
2.43.0
