On 1/2/24 08:27, Romain Gantois wrote:
Some DSA tagging protocols change the EtherType field in the MAC header
e.g. DSA_TAG_PROTO_(DSA/EDSA/BRCM/MTK/RTL4C_A/SJA1105). On TX these tagged
frames are ignored by the checksum offload engine and IP header checker of
some stmmac cores.
On RX, the stmmac driver wrongly assumes that checksums have been computed
for these tagged packets, and sets CHECKSUM_UNNECESSARY.
Add an additional check in the stmmac tx and rx hotpaths so that COE is
deactivated for packets with ethertypes that will not trigger the COE and
ip header checks.
Fixes: 6b2c6e4a938f ("net: stmmac: propagate feature flags to vlan")
Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Reported-by: Richard Tresidder <rtresidd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/e5c6c75f-2dfa-4e50-a1fb-6bf4cdb617c2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/
Reported-by: Romain Gantois <romain.gantois@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/c57283ed-6b9b-b0e6-ee12-5655c1c54495@xxxxxxxxxxx/
Fairly sure those should be Link: and Closes: should be used for bug
tracker entries.
Signed-off-by: Romain Gantois <romain.gantois@xxxxxxxxxxx>
---
.../net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_main.c | 21 ++++++++++++++++---
1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_main.c
index 37e64283f910..bb2ae6b32b2f 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_main.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_main.c
@@ -4371,6 +4371,17 @@ static netdev_tx_t stmmac_tso_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev)
return NETDEV_TX_OK;
}
+/* Check if ethertype will trigger IP
+ * header checks/COE in hardware
+ */
+static inline bool stmmac_has_ip_ethertype(struct sk_buff *skb)
+{
+ __be16 proto = eth_header_parse_protocol(skb);
+
+ return (proto == htons(ETH_P_IP)) || (proto == htons(ETH_P_IPV6)) ||
+ (proto == htons(ETH_P_8021Q));
Do you need to include ETH_P_8021AD in that list as well or is not
stmmac capable of checksuming beyond a single VLAN tag?
Thanks!
--
Florian