Re: [PATCH v6 1/7] serial: Do not hold the port lock when setting rx-during-tx GPIO

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Lino Sanfilippo wrote on 2023-12-25 12:35:
diff --git a/drivers/tty/serial/serial_core.c b/drivers/tty/serial/serial_core.c
index f1348a509552..d155131f221d 100644
--- a/drivers/tty/serial/serial_core.c
+++ b/drivers/tty/serial/serial_core.c
@@ -1402,6 +1402,16 @@ static void uart_set_rs485_termination(struct
uart_port *port,
 				 !!(rs485->flags & SER_RS485_TERMINATE_BUS));
 }

+static void uart_set_rs485_rx_during_tx(struct uart_port *port,
+					const struct serial_rs485 *rs485)
+{
+	if (!(rs485->flags & SER_RS485_ENABLED))
+		return;
+

How about checking port->rs485_rx_during_tx_gpio here against NULL instead of
before every call?

+	gpiod_set_value_cansleep(port->rs485_rx_during_tx_gpio,
+				 !!(rs485->flags & SER_RS485_RX_DURING_TX));
+}
+
 static int uart_rs485_config(struct uart_port *port)
 {
 	struct serial_rs485 *rs485 = &port->rs485;
@@ -1413,12 +1423,17 @@ static int uart_rs485_config(struct uart_port *port)

 	uart_sanitize_serial_rs485(port, rs485);
 	uart_set_rs485_termination(port, rs485);
+	uart_set_rs485_rx_during_tx(port, rs485);

 	uart_port_lock_irqsave(port, &flags);
 	ret = port->rs485_config(port, NULL, rs485);
 	uart_port_unlock_irqrestore(port, flags);
-	if (ret)
+	if (ret) {
 		memset(rs485, 0, sizeof(*rs485));
+		/* unset GPIOs */
+		gpiod_set_value_cansleep(port->rs485_term_gpio, 0);
+		gpiod_set_value_cansleep(port->rs485_rx_during_tx_gpio, 0);
+	}

 	return ret;
 }
@@ -1457,6 +1472,7 @@ static int uart_set_rs485_config(struct
tty_struct *tty, struct uart_port *port,
 		return ret;
 	uart_sanitize_serial_rs485(port, &rs485);
 	uart_set_rs485_termination(port, &rs485);
+	uart_set_rs485_rx_during_tx(port, &rs485);

 	uart_port_lock_irqsave(port, &flags);
 	ret = port->rs485_config(port, &tty->termios, &rs485);
@@ -1468,8 +1484,14 @@ static int uart_set_rs485_config(struct
tty_struct *tty, struct uart_port *port,
 			port->ops->set_mctrl(port, port->mctrl);
 	}
 	uart_port_unlock_irqrestore(port, flags);
-	if (ret)
+	if (ret) {
+		/* restore old GPIO settings */
+		gpiod_set_value_cansleep(port->rs485_term_gpio,
+			!!(port->rs485.flags & SER_RS485_TERMINATE_BUS));
+		gpiod_set_value_cansleep(port->rs485_rx_during_tx_gpio,
+			!!(port->rs485.flags & SER_RS485_RX_DURING_TX));

This does not look like restoring.
Further this looks suspiciously like duplicated code.

 		return ret;
+	}

 	if (copy_to_user(rs485_user, &port->rs485, sizeof(port->rs485)))
 		return -EFAULT;
diff --git a/drivers/tty/serial/stm32-usart.c b/drivers/tty/serial/stm32-usart.c
index 3048620315d6..ec9a72a5bea9 100644
--- a/drivers/tty/serial/stm32-usart.c
+++ b/drivers/tty/serial/stm32-usart.c
@@ -226,10 +226,7 @@ static int stm32_usart_config_rs485(struct
uart_port *port, struct ktermios *ter

 	stm32_usart_clr_bits(port, ofs->cr1, BIT(cfg->uart_enable_bit));

-	if (port->rs485_rx_during_tx_gpio)
-		gpiod_set_value_cansleep(port->rs485_rx_during_tx_gpio,
-					 !!(rs485conf->flags & SER_RS485_RX_DURING_TX));
-	else
+	if (!port->rs485_rx_during_tx_gpio)

Should the ! be there?

 		rs485conf->flags |= SER_RS485_RX_DURING_TX;

 	if (rs485conf->flags & SER_RS485_ENABLED) {

Kind Regards
Maarten Brock





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Development Newbies]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux