[PATCH 5.15 067/159] ksmbd: Fix resource leak in smb2_lock()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



5.15-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Marios Makassikis <mmakassikis@xxxxxxxxxx>

[ Upstream commit 01f6c61bae3d658058ee6322af77acea26a5ee3a ]

"flock" is leaked if an error happens before smb2_lock_init(), as the
lock is not added to the lock_list to be cleaned up.

Signed-off-by: Marios Makassikis <mmakassikis@xxxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Namjae Jeon <linkinjeon@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Steve French <stfrench@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 fs/ksmbd/smb2pdu.c |    4 ++++
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)

--- a/fs/ksmbd/smb2pdu.c
+++ b/fs/ksmbd/smb2pdu.c
@@ -6907,6 +6907,7 @@ int smb2_lock(struct ksmbd_work *work)
 		if (lock_start > U64_MAX - lock_length) {
 			pr_err("Invalid lock range requested\n");
 			rsp->hdr.Status = STATUS_INVALID_LOCK_RANGE;
+			locks_free_lock(flock);
 			goto out;
 		}
 
@@ -6926,6 +6927,7 @@ int smb2_lock(struct ksmbd_work *work)
 				    "the end offset(%llx) is smaller than the start offset(%llx)\n",
 				    flock->fl_end, flock->fl_start);
 			rsp->hdr.Status = STATUS_INVALID_LOCK_RANGE;
+			locks_free_lock(flock);
 			goto out;
 		}
 
@@ -6937,6 +6939,7 @@ int smb2_lock(struct ksmbd_work *work)
 				    flock->fl_type != F_UNLCK) {
 					pr_err("conflict two locks in one request\n");
 					err = -EINVAL;
+					locks_free_lock(flock);
 					goto out;
 				}
 			}
@@ -6945,6 +6948,7 @@ int smb2_lock(struct ksmbd_work *work)
 		smb_lock = smb2_lock_init(flock, cmd, flags, &lock_list);
 		if (!smb_lock) {
 			err = -EINVAL;
+			locks_free_lock(flock);
 			goto out;
 		}
 	}






[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Development Newbies]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux