5.15-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@xxxxxxxxxx>
[ Upstream commit e8d585b2f68c0b10c966ee55146de043429085a3 ]
'destroy_workqueue()' already drains the queue before destroying it, so
there is no need to flush it explicitly.
Remove the redundant 'flush_workqueue()' calls.
This was generated with coccinelle:
@@
expression E;
@@
- flush_workqueue(E);
destroy_workqueue(E);
Acked-by: Namjae Jeon <linkinjeon@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Steve French <stfrench@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
fs/ksmbd/ksmbd_work.c | 1 -
fs/ksmbd/transport_rdma.c | 1 -
2 files changed, 2 deletions(-)
--- a/fs/ksmbd/ksmbd_work.c
+++ b/fs/ksmbd/ksmbd_work.c
@@ -69,7 +69,6 @@ int ksmbd_workqueue_init(void)
void ksmbd_workqueue_destroy(void)
{
- flush_workqueue(ksmbd_wq);
destroy_workqueue(ksmbd_wq);
ksmbd_wq = NULL;
}
--- a/fs/ksmbd/transport_rdma.c
+++ b/fs/ksmbd/transport_rdma.c
@@ -2049,7 +2049,6 @@ int ksmbd_rdma_destroy(void)
smb_direct_listener.cm_id = NULL;
if (smb_direct_wq) {
- flush_workqueue(smb_direct_wq);
destroy_workqueue(smb_direct_wq);
smb_direct_wq = NULL;
}
