Re: [PATCH for-5.15.y 0/3] Revert lt9611uxc fixes which broke

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: [PATCH for-5.15.y 0/3] Revert lt9611uxc fixes which broke
From: Greg KH <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2023 11:52:52 +0100
Cc: Stable <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx>, Maxime Ripard <maxime@xxxxxxxxxx>, Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@xxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <CAMi1Hd3-kYAfSOS7SBR2=ZLZ0sbvDWgyPm=t0KALzGpdomQGSw@mail.gmail.com>

On Tue, Dec 19, 2023 at 03:44:14PM +0530, Amit Pundir wrote:
> Apologies for the half-baked subject line. I don't know what went
> wrong there. I meant "Revert lt9611uxc fixes which broke display on
> RB5".

Thanks, will queue these up after the latest -rc releases are done in a
few days.

greg k-h

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH for-5.15.y 0/3] Revert lt9611uxc fixes which broke
  - From: Greg KH

References:
- [PATCH for-5.15.y 0/3] Revert lt9611uxc fixes which broke
  - From: Amit Pundir
- Re: [PATCH for-5.15.y 0/3] Revert lt9611uxc fixes which broke
  - From: Amit Pundir

Prev by Date: stable-rc/queue/6.6 build: 19 builds: 0 failed, 19 passed (v6.6.7-166-g323633885756)
Next by Date: stable-rc/queue/5.4 build: 17 builds: 0 failed, 17 passed, 26 warnings (v5.4.264-40-g7c925b38e23d)
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH for-5.15.y 0/3] Revert lt9611uxc fixes which broke
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH for-5.15.y 0/3] Revert lt9611uxc fixes which broke
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Kernel] [Kernel Development Newbies] [Linux USB Devel] [Video for Linux] [Linux Audio Users] [Yosemite Hiking] [Linux Kernel] [Linux SCSI]

Powered by Linux