6.6-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. ------------------ From: Coly Li <colyli@xxxxxxx> [ Upstream commit 31f5b956a197d4ec25c8a07cb3a2ab69d0c0b82f ] This patch adds code comments to bch_btree_node_get() and __bch_btree_node_alloc() that NULL pointer will not be returned and it is unnecessary to check NULL pointer by the callers of these routines. Signed-off-by: Coly Li <colyli@xxxxxxx> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231120052503.6122-10-colyli@xxxxxxx Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx> --- drivers/md/bcache/btree.c | 7 +++++++ 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+) diff --git a/drivers/md/bcache/btree.c b/drivers/md/bcache/btree.c index 3084c57248f69..b709c2fde782a 100644 --- a/drivers/md/bcache/btree.c +++ b/drivers/md/bcache/btree.c @@ -995,6 +995,9 @@ static struct btree *mca_alloc(struct cache_set *c, struct btree_op *op, * * The btree node will have either a read or a write lock held, depending on * level and op->lock. + * + * Note: Only error code or btree pointer will be returned, it is unncessary + * for callers to check NULL pointer. */ struct btree *bch_btree_node_get(struct cache_set *c, struct btree_op *op, struct bkey *k, int level, bool write, @@ -1106,6 +1109,10 @@ static void btree_node_free(struct btree *b) mutex_unlock(&b->c->bucket_lock); } +/* + * Only error code or btree pointer will be returned, it is unncessary for + * callers to check NULL pointer. + */ struct btree *__bch_btree_node_alloc(struct cache_set *c, struct btree_op *op, int level, bool wait, struct btree *parent) -- 2.43.0
