6.1-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. ------------------ From: Steven Rostedt (Google) <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx> commit 0aa0e5289cfe984a8a9fdd79ccf46ccf080151f7 upstream. The rb_time_cmpxchg() on 32-bit architectures requires setting three 32-bit words to represent the 64-bit timestamp, with some salt for synchronization. Those are: msb, top, and bottom The issue is, the rb_time_cmpxchg() did not properly salt the msb portion, and the msb that was written was stale. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-trace-kernel/20231215084114.20899342@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Cc: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@xxxxxxxxxx> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@xxxxxxx> Cc: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Fixes: f03f2abce4f39 ("ring-buffer: Have 32 bit time stamps use all 64 bits") Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (Google) <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) --- a/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c +++ b/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c @@ -727,10 +727,12 @@ static int rb_time_cmpxchg(rb_time_t *t, cnt2 = cnt + 1; rb_time_split(val, &top, &bottom, &msb); + msb = rb_time_val_cnt(msb, cnt); top = rb_time_val_cnt(top, cnt); bottom = rb_time_val_cnt(bottom, cnt); rb_time_split(set, &top2, &bottom2, &msb2); + msb2 = rb_time_val_cnt(msb2, cnt); top2 = rb_time_val_cnt(top2, cnt2); bottom2 = rb_time_val_cnt(bottom2, cnt2);
