5.15-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@xxxxxxxxxx>
commit 4cdf351d3630a640ab6a05721ef055b9df62277f upstream.
In general, activating long mode involves setting the EFER_LME bit in
the EFER register and then enabling the X86_CR0_PG bit in the CR0
register. At this point, the EFER_LMA bit will be set automatically by
hardware.
In the case of SVM/SEV guests where writes to CR0 are intercepted, it's
necessary for the host to set EFER_LMA on behalf of the guest since
hardware does not see the actual CR0 write.
In the case of SEV-ES guests where writes to CR0 are trapped instead of
intercepted, the hardware *does* see/record the write to CR0 before
exiting and passing the value on to the host, so as part of enabling
SEV-ES support commit f1c6366e3043 ("KVM: SVM: Add required changes to
support intercepts under SEV-ES") dropped special handling of the
EFER_LMA bit with the understanding that it would be set automatically.
However, since the guest never explicitly sets the EFER_LMA bit, the
host never becomes aware that it has been set. This becomes problematic
when userspace tries to get/set the EFER values via
KVM_GET_SREGS/KVM_SET_SREGS, since the EFER contents tracked by the host
will be missing the EFER_LMA bit, and when userspace attempts to pass
the EFER value back via KVM_SET_SREGS it will fail a sanity check that
asserts that EFER_LMA should always be set when X86_CR0_PG and EFER_LME
are set.
Fix this by always inferring the value of EFER_LMA based on X86_CR0_PG
and EFER_LME, regardless of whether or not SEV-ES is enabled.
Fixes: f1c6366e3043 ("KVM: SVM: Add required changes to support intercepts under SEV-ES")
Reported-by: Peter Gonda <pgonda@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@xxxxxxxxxx>
Message-Id: <20210507165947.2502412-2-seanjc@xxxxxxxxxx>
[A two year old patch that was revived after we noticed the failure in
KVM_SET_SREGS and a similar patch was posted by Michael Roth. This is
Sean's patch, but with Michael's more complete commit message. - Paolo]
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c | 8 +++++---
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c
@@ -1750,15 +1750,17 @@ void svm_set_cr0(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
bool old_paging = is_paging(vcpu);
#ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
- if (vcpu->arch.efer & EFER_LME && !vcpu->arch.guest_state_protected) {
+ if (vcpu->arch.efer & EFER_LME) {
if (!is_paging(vcpu) && (cr0 & X86_CR0_PG)) {
vcpu->arch.efer |= EFER_LMA;
- svm->vmcb->save.efer |= EFER_LMA | EFER_LME;
+ if (!vcpu->arch.guest_state_protected)
+ svm->vmcb->save.efer |= EFER_LMA | EFER_LME;
}
if (is_paging(vcpu) && !(cr0 & X86_CR0_PG)) {
vcpu->arch.efer &= ~EFER_LMA;
- svm->vmcb->save.efer &= ~(EFER_LMA | EFER_LME);
+ if (!vcpu->arch.guest_state_protected)
+ svm->vmcb->save.efer &= ~(EFER_LMA | EFER_LME);
}
}
#endif
