Re: [request for stable inclusion 0/2] Two patches related to ARM instruction order

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 06:37:14PM +0800, Wang Nan wrote:
> Hi Greg,
> 
>    Could you please queue following patches to 3.10 LTS queue and the
>    second one to 3.14 LTS queue?
> 
>    commit 63328070eff2f4fd730c86966a0dbc976147c39f:
>      ARM: Correct BUG() assembly to ensure it is endian-agnostic
>    commit 888be25402021a425da3e85e2d5a954d7509286e:
>      ARM: probes: fix instruction fetch order with <asm/opcodes.h>
> 
>    They are bugfix on ARM, dealing with instruction fetch order.
>    The second one needs context adjustment, I'll post it by replying
>    this mail.
> 
>    I posted a stable inclusion requirement several days ago for
>    the second one and haven't receive your reply:
> 
>    http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.stable/103321
> 
>    Now I find it depend on the first commit in thumb case to include
>    <asm/opcodes.h>. My patch in previous post is unable to compile in
>    thumb case. Please ignore it and use this version.

Both now applied, thanks.

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Development Newbies]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]