6.6-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Hengqi Chen <hengqi.chen@xxxxxxxxx>
[ Upstream commit fe5757553bf9ebe45ae8ecab5922f6937c8d8dfc ]
The `cgrp_local_storage` test triggers a kernel panic like:
# ./test_progs -t cgrp_local_storage
Can't find bpf_testmod.ko kernel module: -2
WARNING! Selftests relying on bpf_testmod.ko will be skipped.
[ 550.930632] CPU 1 Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address 0000000000000080, era == ffff80000200be34, ra == ffff80000200be00
[ 550.931781] Oops[#1]:
[ 550.931966] CPU: 1 PID: 1303 Comm: test_progs Not tainted 6.7.0-rc2-loong-devel-g2f56bb0d2327 #35 a896aca3f4164f09cc346f89f2e09832e07be5f6
[ 550.932215] Hardware name: QEMU QEMU Virtual Machine, BIOS unknown 2/2/2022
[ 550.932403] pc ffff80000200be34 ra ffff80000200be00 tp 9000000108350000 sp 9000000108353dc0
[ 550.932545] a0 0000000000000000 a1 0000000000000517 a2 0000000000000118 a3 00007ffffbb15558
[ 550.932682] a4 00007ffffbb15620 a5 90000001004e7700 a6 0000000000000021 a7 0000000000000118
[ 550.932824] t0 ffff80000200bdc0 t1 0000000000000517 t2 0000000000000517 t3 00007ffff1c06ee0
[ 550.932961] t4 0000555578ae04d0 t5 fffffffffffffff8 t6 0000000000000004 t7 0000000000000020
[ 550.933097] t8 0000000000000040 u0 00000000000007b8 s9 9000000108353e00 s0 90000001004e7700
[ 550.933241] s1 9000000004005000 s2 0000000000000001 s3 0000000000000000 s4 0000555555eb2ec8
[ 550.933379] s5 00007ffffbb15bb8 s6 00007ffff1dafd60 s7 000055555663f610 s8 00007ffff1db0050
[ 550.933520] ra: ffff80000200be00 bpf_prog_98f1b9e767be2a84_on_enter+0x40/0x200
[ 550.933911] ERA: ffff80000200be34 bpf_prog_98f1b9e767be2a84_on_enter+0x74/0x200
[ 550.934105] CRMD: 000000b0 (PLV0 -IE -DA +PG DACF=CC DACM=CC -WE)
[ 550.934596] PRMD: 00000004 (PPLV0 +PIE -PWE)
[ 550.934712] EUEN: 00000003 (+FPE +SXE -ASXE -BTE)
[ 550.934836] ECFG: 00071c1c (LIE=2-4,10-12 VS=7)
[ 550.934976] ESTAT: 00010000 [PIL] (IS= ECode=1 EsubCode=0)
[ 550.935097] BADV: 0000000000000080
[ 550.935181] PRID: 0014c010 (Loongson-64bit, Loongson-3A5000)
[ 550.935291] Modules linked in:
[ 550.935391] Process test_progs (pid: 1303, threadinfo=000000006c3b1c41, task=0000000061f84a55)
[ 550.935643] Stack : 00007ffffbb15bb8 0000555555eb2ec8 0000000000000000 0000000000000001
[ 550.935844] 9000000004005000 ffff80001b864000 00007ffffbb15450 90000000029aa034
[ 550.935990] 0000000000000000 9000000108353ec0 0000000000000118 d07d9dfb09721a09
[ 550.936175] 0000000000000001 0000000000000000 9000000108353ec0 0000000000000118
[ 550.936314] 9000000101d46ad0 900000000290abf0 000055555663f610 0000000000000000
[ 550.936479] 0000000000000003 9000000108353ec0 00007ffffbb15450 90000000029d7288
[ 550.936635] 00007ffff1dafd60 000055555663f610 0000000000000000 0000000000000003
[ 550.936779] 9000000108353ec0 90000000035dd1f0 00007ffff1dafd58 9000000002841c5c
[ 550.936939] 0000000000000119 0000555555eea5a8 00007ffff1d78780 00007ffffbb153e0
[ 550.937083] ffffffffffffffda 00007ffffbb15518 0000000000000040 00007ffffbb15558
[ 550.937224] ...
[ 550.937299] Call Trace:
[ 550.937521] [<ffff80000200be34>] bpf_prog_98f1b9e767be2a84_on_enter+0x74/0x200
[ 550.937910] [<90000000029aa034>] bpf_trace_run2+0x90/0x154
[ 550.938105] [<900000000290abf0>] syscall_trace_enter.isra.0+0x1cc/0x200
[ 550.938224] [<90000000035dd1f0>] do_syscall+0x48/0x94
[ 550.938319] [<9000000002841c5c>] handle_syscall+0xbc/0x158
[ 550.938477]
[ 550.938607] Code: 580009ae 50016000 262402e4 <28c20085> 14092084 03a00084 16000024 03240084 00150006
[ 550.938851]
[ 550.939021] ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---
Further investigation shows that this panic is triggered by memory
load operations:
ptr = bpf_cgrp_storage_get(&map_a, task->cgroups->dfl_cgrp, 0,
BPF_LOCAL_STORAGE_GET_F_CREATE);
The expression `task->cgroups->dfl_cgrp` involves two memory load.
Since the field offset fits in imm12 or imm14, we use ldd or ldptrd
instructions. But both instructions have the side effect that it will
signed-extended the imm operand. Finally, we got the wrong addresses
and panics is inevitable.
Use a generic ldxd instruction to avoid this kind of issues.
With this change, we have:
# ./test_progs -t cgrp_local_storage
Can't find bpf_testmod.ko kernel module: -2
WARNING! Selftests relying on bpf_testmod.ko will be skipped.
test_cgrp_local_storage:PASS:join_cgroup /cgrp_local_storage 0 nsec
#48/1 cgrp_local_storage/tp_btf:OK
test_attach_cgroup:PASS:skel_open 0 nsec
test_attach_cgroup:PASS:prog_attach 0 nsec
test_attach_cgroup:PASS:prog_attach 0 nsec
libbpf: prog 'update_cookie_tracing': failed to attach: ERROR: strerror_r(-524)=22
test_attach_cgroup:FAIL:prog_attach unexpected error: -524
#48/2 cgrp_local_storage/attach_cgroup:FAIL
test_recursion:PASS:skel_open_and_load 0 nsec
libbpf: prog 'on_lookup': failed to attach: ERROR: strerror_r(-524)=22
libbpf: prog 'on_lookup': failed to auto-attach: -524
test_recursion:FAIL:skel_attach unexpected error: -524 (errno 524)
#48/3 cgrp_local_storage/recursion:FAIL
#48/4 cgrp_local_storage/negative:OK
#48/5 cgrp_local_storage/cgroup_iter_sleepable:OK
test_yes_rcu_lock:PASS:skel_open 0 nsec
test_yes_rcu_lock:PASS:skel_load 0 nsec
libbpf: prog 'yes_rcu_lock': failed to attach: ERROR: strerror_r(-524)=22
libbpf: prog 'yes_rcu_lock': failed to auto-attach: -524
test_yes_rcu_lock:FAIL:skel_attach unexpected error: -524 (errno 524)
#48/6 cgrp_local_storage/yes_rcu_lock:FAIL
#48/7 cgrp_local_storage/no_rcu_lock:OK
#48 cgrp_local_storage:FAIL
All error logs:
test_cgrp_local_storage:PASS:join_cgroup /cgrp_local_storage 0 nsec
test_attach_cgroup:PASS:skel_open 0 nsec
test_attach_cgroup:PASS:prog_attach 0 nsec
test_attach_cgroup:PASS:prog_attach 0 nsec
libbpf: prog 'update_cookie_tracing': failed to attach: ERROR: strerror_r(-524)=22
test_attach_cgroup:FAIL:prog_attach unexpected error: -524
#48/2 cgrp_local_storage/attach_cgroup:FAIL
test_recursion:PASS:skel_open_and_load 0 nsec
libbpf: prog 'on_lookup': failed to attach: ERROR: strerror_r(-524)=22
libbpf: prog 'on_lookup': failed to auto-attach: -524
test_recursion:FAIL:skel_attach unexpected error: -524 (errno 524)
#48/3 cgrp_local_storage/recursion:FAIL
test_yes_rcu_lock:PASS:skel_open 0 nsec
test_yes_rcu_lock:PASS:skel_load 0 nsec
libbpf: prog 'yes_rcu_lock': failed to attach: ERROR: strerror_r(-524)=22
libbpf: prog 'yes_rcu_lock': failed to auto-attach: -524
test_yes_rcu_lock:FAIL:skel_attach unexpected error: -524 (errno 524)
#48/6 cgrp_local_storage/yes_rcu_lock:FAIL
#48 cgrp_local_storage:FAIL
Summary: 0/4 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 1 FAILED
No panics any more (The test still failed because lack of BPF trampoline
which I am actively working on).
Fixes: 5dc615520c4d ("LoongArch: Add BPF JIT support")
Signed-off-by: Hengqi Chen <hengqi.chen@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
arch/loongarch/net/bpf_jit.c | 10 ++--------
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/loongarch/net/bpf_jit.c b/arch/loongarch/net/bpf_jit.c
index db9342b2d0e66..5d02bc6acec2e 100644
--- a/arch/loongarch/net/bpf_jit.c
+++ b/arch/loongarch/net/bpf_jit.c
@@ -907,14 +907,8 @@ static int build_insn(const struct bpf_insn *insn, struct jit_ctx *ctx, bool ext
}
break;
case BPF_DW:
- if (is_signed_imm12(off)) {
- emit_insn(ctx, ldd, dst, src, off);
- } else if (is_signed_imm14(off)) {
- emit_insn(ctx, ldptrd, dst, src, off);
- } else {
- move_imm(ctx, t1, off, is32);
- emit_insn(ctx, ldxd, dst, src, t1);
- }
+ move_imm(ctx, t1, off, is32);
+ emit_insn(ctx, ldxd, dst, src, t1);
break;
}
--
2.42.0
