On 12/5/23 23:14, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
Per the commit message of commit 'dd014803f260 ("interconnect: qcom:
icc-rpm: Add AB/IB calculations coefficients")', the peak rate should be
100/ib_percent. But, in what looks like a typical typo, the numerator
value is discarded in the calculation.
Update the implementation to match the described intention.
Fixes: dd014803f260 ("interconnect: qcom: icc-rpm: Add AB/IB calculations coefficients")
Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Andersson <quic_bjorande@xxxxxxxxxxx>
---
Spotted while reading the code, patch is untested.
---
drivers/interconnect/qcom/icc-rpm.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/interconnect/qcom/icc-rpm.c b/drivers/interconnect/qcom/icc-rpm.c
index fb54e78f8fd7..a8ed435f696c 100644
--- a/drivers/interconnect/qcom/icc-rpm.c
+++ b/drivers/interconnect/qcom/icc-rpm.c
@@ -307,7 +307,7 @@ static u64 qcom_icc_calc_rate(struct qcom_icc_provider *qp, struct qcom_icc_node
if (qn->ib_coeff) {
agg_peak_rate = qn->max_peak[ctx] * 100;
- agg_peak_rate = div_u64(qn->max_peak[ctx], qn->ib_coeff);
+ agg_peak_rate = div_u64(agg_peak_rate, qn->ib_coeff);
Oh fun.. I'dve assumed the compiler is smart enough to catch this
Reviewed-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@xxxxxxxxxx>
Konrad
