5.10-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
[ Upstream commit bca4104b00fec60be330cd32818dd5c70db3d469 ]
Kent reported an occasional KASAN splat in lockdep. Mark then noted:
> I suspect the dodgy access is to chain_block_buckets[-1], which hits the last 4
> bytes of the redzone and gets (incorrectly/misleadingly) attributed to
> nr_large_chain_blocks.
That would mean @size == 0, at which point size_to_bucket() returns -1
and the above happens.
alloc_chain_hlocks() has 'size - req', for the first with the
precondition 'size >= rq', which allows the 0.
This code is trying to split a block, del_chain_block() takes what we
need, and add_chain_block() puts back the remainder, except in the
above case the remainder is 0 sized and things go sideways.
Fixes: 810507fe6fd5 ("locking/lockdep: Reuse freed chain_hlocks entries")
Reported-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Tested-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@xxxxxxxxx>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20231121114126.GH8262@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
kernel/locking/lockdep.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/kernel/locking/lockdep.c b/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
index 6cbd2b4444769..7471d85f54ae5 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
@@ -3357,7 +3357,8 @@ static int alloc_chain_hlocks(int req)
size = chain_block_size(curr);
if (likely(size >= req)) {
del_chain_block(0, size, chain_block_next(curr));
- add_chain_block(curr + req, size - req);
+ if (size > req)
+ add_chain_block(curr + req, size - req);
return curr;
}
}
--
2.42.0
