The patch below does not apply to the 6.1-stable tree. If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>. To reproduce the conflict and resubmit, you may use the following commands: git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-6.1.y git checkout FETCH_HEAD git cherry-pick -x a1461f1fd6cfdc4b8917c9d4a91e92605d1f28dc # <resolve conflicts, build, test, etc.> git commit -s git send-email --to '<stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>' --in-reply-to '2023120321-emboss-bunion-bf59@gregkh' --subject-prefix 'PATCH 6.1.y' HEAD^.. Possible dependencies: a1461f1fd6cf ("rethook: Use __rcu pointer for rethook::handler") 4bbd93455659 ("kprobes: kretprobe scalability improvement") 8865aea0471c ("kernel: kprobes: Use struct_size()") 195b9cb5b288 ("fprobe: Ensure running fprobe_exit_handler() finished before calling rethook_free()") 5f81018753df ("fprobe: Release rethook after the ftrace_ops is unregistered") 76d0de5729c0 ("fprobe: Pass entry_data to handlers") thanks, greg k-h ------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------ >From a1461f1fd6cfdc4b8917c9d4a91e92605d1f28dc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "Masami Hiramatsu (Google)" <mhiramat@xxxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 1 Dec 2023 14:53:56 +0900 Subject: [PATCH] rethook: Use __rcu pointer for rethook::handler Since the rethook::handler is an RCU-maganged pointer so that it will notice readers the rethook is stopped (unregistered) or not, it should be an __rcu pointer and use appropriate functions to be accessed. This will use appropriate memory barrier when accessing it. OTOH, rethook::data is never changed, so we don't need to check it in get_kretprobe(). NOTE: To avoid sparse warning, rethook::handler is defined by a raw function pointer type with __rcu instead of rethook_handler_t. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/170126066201.398836.837498688669005979.stgit@devnote2/ Fixes: 54ecbe6f1ed5 ("rethook: Add a generic return hook") Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@xxxxxxxxx> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202311241808.rv9ceuAh-lkp@xxxxxxxxx/ Tested-by: JP Kobryn <inwardvessel@xxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@xxxxxxxxxx> diff --git a/include/linux/kprobes.h b/include/linux/kprobes.h index 64672bace560..0ff44d6633e3 100644 --- a/include/linux/kprobes.h +++ b/include/linux/kprobes.h @@ -197,10 +197,8 @@ extern int arch_trampoline_kprobe(struct kprobe *p); #ifdef CONFIG_KRETPROBE_ON_RETHOOK static nokprobe_inline struct kretprobe *get_kretprobe(struct kretprobe_instance *ri) { - RCU_LOCKDEP_WARN(!rcu_read_lock_any_held(), - "Kretprobe is accessed from instance under preemptive context"); - - return (struct kretprobe *)READ_ONCE(ri->node.rethook->data); + /* rethook::data is non-changed field, so that you can access it freely. */ + return (struct kretprobe *)ri->node.rethook->data; } static nokprobe_inline unsigned long get_kretprobe_retaddr(struct kretprobe_instance *ri) { diff --git a/include/linux/rethook.h b/include/linux/rethook.h index ce69b2b7bc35..ba60962805f6 100644 --- a/include/linux/rethook.h +++ b/include/linux/rethook.h @@ -28,7 +28,12 @@ typedef void (*rethook_handler_t) (struct rethook_node *, void *, unsigned long, */ struct rethook { void *data; - rethook_handler_t handler; + /* + * To avoid sparse warnings, this uses a raw function pointer with + * __rcu, instead of rethook_handler_t. But this must be same as + * rethook_handler_t. + */ + void (__rcu *handler) (struct rethook_node *, void *, unsigned long, struct pt_regs *); struct objpool_head pool; struct rcu_head rcu; }; diff --git a/kernel/trace/rethook.c b/kernel/trace/rethook.c index 6fd7d4ecbbc6..fa03094e9e69 100644 --- a/kernel/trace/rethook.c +++ b/kernel/trace/rethook.c @@ -48,7 +48,7 @@ static void rethook_free_rcu(struct rcu_head *head) */ void rethook_stop(struct rethook *rh) { - WRITE_ONCE(rh->handler, NULL); + rcu_assign_pointer(rh->handler, NULL); } /** @@ -63,7 +63,7 @@ void rethook_stop(struct rethook *rh) */ void rethook_free(struct rethook *rh) { - WRITE_ONCE(rh->handler, NULL); + rethook_stop(rh); call_rcu(&rh->rcu, rethook_free_rcu); } @@ -82,6 +82,12 @@ static int rethook_fini_pool(struct objpool_head *head, void *context) return 0; } +static inline rethook_handler_t rethook_get_handler(struct rethook *rh) +{ + return (rethook_handler_t)rcu_dereference_check(rh->handler, + rcu_read_lock_any_held()); +} + /** * rethook_alloc() - Allocate struct rethook. * @data: a data to pass the @handler when hooking the return. @@ -107,7 +113,7 @@ struct rethook *rethook_alloc(void *data, rethook_handler_t handler, return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM); rh->data = data; - rh->handler = handler; + rcu_assign_pointer(rh->handler, handler); /* initialize the objpool for rethook nodes */ if (objpool_init(&rh->pool, num, size, GFP_KERNEL, rh, @@ -135,9 +141,10 @@ static void free_rethook_node_rcu(struct rcu_head *head) */ void rethook_recycle(struct rethook_node *node) { - lockdep_assert_preemption_disabled(); + rethook_handler_t handler; - if (likely(READ_ONCE(node->rethook->handler))) + handler = rethook_get_handler(node->rethook); + if (likely(handler)) objpool_push(node, &node->rethook->pool); else call_rcu(&node->rcu, free_rethook_node_rcu); @@ -153,9 +160,7 @@ NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(rethook_recycle); */ struct rethook_node *rethook_try_get(struct rethook *rh) { - rethook_handler_t handler = READ_ONCE(rh->handler); - - lockdep_assert_preemption_disabled(); + rethook_handler_t handler = rethook_get_handler(rh); /* Check whether @rh is going to be freed. */ if (unlikely(!handler)) @@ -300,7 +305,7 @@ unsigned long rethook_trampoline_handler(struct pt_regs *regs, rhn = container_of(first, struct rethook_node, llist); if (WARN_ON_ONCE(rhn->frame != frame)) break; - handler = READ_ONCE(rhn->rethook->handler); + handler = rethook_get_handler(rhn->rethook); if (handler) handler(rhn, rhn->rethook->data, correct_ret_addr, regs);
