On Tue, Nov 28, 2023 at 10:11:32PM +0100, François Valenduc wrote:
>
> Le 28/11/23 à 20:35, Greg Kroah-Hartman a écrit :
> > On Tue, Nov 28, 2023 at 08:22:22PM +0100, François Valenduc wrote:
> > > Build fails on my baremetal server on scaleway:
> > >
> > > In file included from arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c:54:
> > > arch/x86/kvm/vmx/evmcs.h:215:20: note: previous definition of
> > > ‘evmptr_is_valid’ with type ‘bool(u64)’ {aka ‘_Bool(long long unsigned
> > > int)’}
> > > 215 | static inline bool evmptr_is_valid(u64 evmptr)
> > > | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > > In file included from arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c:55:
> > > arch/x86/kvm/vmx/hyperv.h:184:6: error: redeclaration of ‘enum
> > > nested_evmptrld_status’
> > > 184 | enum nested_evmptrld_status {
> > > | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > > In file included from arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c:54:
> > > arch/x86/kvm/vmx/evmcs.h:220:6: note: originally defined here
> > > 220 | enum nested_evmptrld_status {
> > > | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > > In file included from arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c:55:
> > > arch/x86/kvm/vmx/hyperv.h:185:9: error: redeclaration of enumerator
> > > ‘EVMPTRLD_DISABLED’
> > > 185 | EVMPTRLD_DISABLED,
> > > | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > > In file included from arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c:54:
> > > arch/x86/kvm/vmx/evmcs.h:221:9: note: previous definition of
> > > ‘EVMPTRLD_DISABLED’ with type ‘enum nested_evmptrld_status’
> > > 221 | EVMPTRLD_DISABLED,
> > > | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > > In file included from arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c:55:
> > > arch/x86/kvm/vmx/hyperv.h:186:9: error: redeclaration of enumerator
> > > ‘EVMPTRLD_SUCCEEDED’
> > > 186 | EVMPTRLD_SUCCEEDED,
> > > | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > > In file included from arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c:54:
> > > arch/x86/kvm/vmx/evmcs.h:222:9: note: previous definition of
> > > ‘EVMPTRLD_SUCCEEDED’ with type ‘enum nested_evmptrld_status’
> > > 222 | EVMPTRLD_SUCCEEDED,
> > > | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > > In file included from arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c:55:
> > > arch/x86/kvm/vmx/hyperv.h:187:9: error: redeclaration of enumerator
> > > ‘EVMPTRLD_VMFAIL’
> > > 187 | EVMPTRLD_VMFAIL,
> > > | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > > In file included from arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c:54:
> > > arch/x86/kvm/vmx/evmcs.h:223:9: note: previous definition of
> > > ‘EVMPTRLD_VMFAIL’ with type ‘enum nested_evmptrld_status’
> > > 223 | EVMPTRLD_VMFAIL,
> > > | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > > In file included from arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c:55:
> > > arch/x86/kvm/vmx/hyperv.h:188:9: error: redeclaration of enumerator
> > > ‘EVMPTRLD_ERROR’
> > > 188 | EVMPTRLD_ERROR,
> > > | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > > In file included from arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c:54:
> > > arch/x86/kvm/vmx/evmcs.h:224:9: note: previous definition of
> > > ‘EVMPTRLD_ERROR’ with type ‘enum nested_evmptrld_status’
> > > 224 | EVMPTRLD_ERROR,
> > > | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > > make[3]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:250: arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.o] Error 1
> > > make[2]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:500: arch/x86/kvm] Error 2
> > > make[1]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:500: arch/x86] Error 2
> > >
> > > The configuration file is attached. Kernel 6.1.62 compiled fine.
> > > Does somebody have an idea about this ?
> > I just tried your .config file here and it builds just fine for 6.1.64,
> > what version of gcc are you using that causes failures? I tried gcc-12
> > successfully.
> >
> > thanks,
> >
> > greg k-h
>
> Bisection gave very strange results until I found the tree was corrupted. I
> recreated it correctly and it works fine.
> Sorry for the noise.
No worries, thanks for reporting it, glad it is resolved.
greg k-h
