Hello! On Mon, 27 Nov 2023 at 09:56, Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx> wrote: > Hello! > > On Fri 24-11-23 23:45:09, Daniel Díaz wrote: > > On 24/11/23 11:50 a. m., Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.15.140 release. > > > There are 297 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > > > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > > > let me know. > > > > > > Responses should be made by Sun, 26 Nov 2023 17:19:17 +0000. > > > Anything received after that time might be too late. > > > > > > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: > > > https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.15.140-rc1.gz > > > or in the git tree and branch at: > > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.15.y > > > and the diffstat can be found below. > > > > > > thanks, > > > > > > greg k-h > > > > We are noticing a regression with ltp-syscalls' preadv03: > > Thanks for report! > > > -----8<----- > > preadv03 preadv03 > > preadv03_64 preadv03_64 > > preadv03.c:102: TINFO: Using block size 512 > > preadv03.c:87: TPASS: preadv(O_DIRECT) read 512 bytes successfully with content 'a' expectedly > > preadv03.c:87: TPASS: preadv(O_DIRECT) read 512 bytes successfully with content 'a' expectedly > > preadv03.c:87: TPASS: preadv(O_DIRECT) read 512 bytes successfully with content 'b' expectedly > > preadv03.c:102: TINFO: Using block size 512 > > preadv03.c:77: TFAIL: Buffer wrong at 0 have 62 expected 61 > > preadv03.c:77: TFAIL: Buffer wrong at 0 have 62 expected 61 > > preadv03.c:66: TFAIL: preadv(O_DIRECT) read 0 bytes, expected 512 > > preadv03.c:102: TINFO: Using block size 512 > > preadv03.c:77: TFAIL: Buffer wrong at 0 have 62 expected 61 > > preadv03.c:77: TFAIL: Buffer wrong at 0 have 62 expected 61 > > preadv03.c:66: TFAIL: preadv(O_DIRECT) read 0 bytes, expected 512 > > preadv03.c:102: TINFO: Using block size 512 > > preadv03.c:87: TPASS: preadv(O_DIRECT) read 512 bytes successfully with content 'a' expectedly > > preadv03.c:87: TPASS: preadv(O_DIRECT) read 512 bytes successfully with content 'a' expectedly > > preadv03.c:87: TPASS: preadv(O_DIRECT) read 512 bytes successfully with content 'b' expectedly > > preadv03.c:102: TINFO: Using block size 512 > > preadv03.c:77: TFAIL: Buffer wrong at 0 have 62 expected 61 > > preadv03.c:77: TFAIL: Buffer wrong at 0 have 62 expected 61 > > preadv03.c:66: TFAIL: preadv(O_DIRECT) read 0 bytes, expected 512 > > preadv03.c:102: TINFO: Using block size 512 > > preadv03.c:77: TFAIL: Buffer wrong at 0 have 62 expected 61 > > preadv03.c:77: TFAIL: Buffer wrong at 0 have 62 expected 61 > > preadv03.c:66: TFAIL: preadv(O_DIRECT) read 0 bytes, expected 512 > > ----->8----- > > > > This is seen in the following environments: > > * dragonboard-845c > > * juno-64k_page_size > > * qemu-arm64 > > * qemu-armv7 > > * qemu-i386 > > * qemu-x86_64 > > * x86_64-clang > > > > and on the following RC's: > > * v5.10.202-rc1 > > * v5.15.140-rc1 > > * v6.1.64-rc1 > > Hum, even in 6.1? That's odd. Can you please test whether current upstream > vanilla kernel works for you with this test? Thanks! Yes, this is working for us on mainline and next: https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-mainline-master/tests/ltp-syscalls/preadv03 https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-next-master/tests/ltp-syscalls/preadv03 c.fr. 6.1: https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-6.1.y/tests/ltp-syscalls/preadv03 Greetings! Daniel Díaz daniel.diaz@xxxxxxxxxx
