[PATCH 5.10 045/193] 9p/trans_fd: Annotate data-racy writes to file::f_flags

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



5.10-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Marco Elver <elver@xxxxxxxxxx>

[ Upstream commit 355f074609dbf3042900ea9d30fcd2b0c323a365 ]

syzbot reported:

 | BUG: KCSAN: data-race in p9_fd_create / p9_fd_create
 |
 | read-write to 0xffff888130fb3d48 of 4 bytes by task 15599 on cpu 0:
 |  p9_fd_open net/9p/trans_fd.c:842 [inline]
 |  p9_fd_create+0x210/0x250 net/9p/trans_fd.c:1092
 |  p9_client_create+0x595/0xa70 net/9p/client.c:1010
 |  v9fs_session_init+0xf9/0xd90 fs/9p/v9fs.c:410
 |  v9fs_mount+0x69/0x630 fs/9p/vfs_super.c:123
 |  legacy_get_tree+0x74/0xd0 fs/fs_context.c:611
 |  vfs_get_tree+0x51/0x190 fs/super.c:1519
 |  do_new_mount+0x203/0x660 fs/namespace.c:3335
 |  path_mount+0x496/0xb30 fs/namespace.c:3662
 |  do_mount fs/namespace.c:3675 [inline]
 |  __do_sys_mount fs/namespace.c:3884 [inline]
 |  [...]
 |
 | read-write to 0xffff888130fb3d48 of 4 bytes by task 15563 on cpu 1:
 |  p9_fd_open net/9p/trans_fd.c:842 [inline]
 |  p9_fd_create+0x210/0x250 net/9p/trans_fd.c:1092
 |  p9_client_create+0x595/0xa70 net/9p/client.c:1010
 |  v9fs_session_init+0xf9/0xd90 fs/9p/v9fs.c:410
 |  v9fs_mount+0x69/0x630 fs/9p/vfs_super.c:123
 |  legacy_get_tree+0x74/0xd0 fs/fs_context.c:611
 |  vfs_get_tree+0x51/0x190 fs/super.c:1519
 |  do_new_mount+0x203/0x660 fs/namespace.c:3335
 |  path_mount+0x496/0xb30 fs/namespace.c:3662
 |  do_mount fs/namespace.c:3675 [inline]
 |  __do_sys_mount fs/namespace.c:3884 [inline]
 |  [...]
 |
 | value changed: 0x00008002 -> 0x00008802

Within p9_fd_open(), O_NONBLOCK is added to f_flags of the read and
write files. This may happen concurrently if e.g. mounting process
modifies the fd in another thread.

Mark the plain read-modify-writes as intentional data-races, with the
assumption that the result of executing the accesses concurrently will
always result in the same result despite the accesses themselves not
being atomic.

Reported-by: syzbot+e441aeeb422763cc5511@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Marco Elver <elver@xxxxxxxxxx>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/ZO38mqkS0TYUlpFp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Dominique Martinet <asmadeus@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Message-ID: <20231025103445.1248103-1-asmadeus@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
 net/9p/trans_fd.c | 13 ++++++++++---
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/9p/trans_fd.c b/net/9p/trans_fd.c
index e070a0b8e5ca3..63f4d2067059e 100644
--- a/net/9p/trans_fd.c
+++ b/net/9p/trans_fd.c
@@ -823,14 +823,21 @@ static int p9_fd_open(struct p9_client *client, int rfd, int wfd)
 		goto out_free_ts;
 	if (!(ts->rd->f_mode & FMODE_READ))
 		goto out_put_rd;
-	/* prevent workers from hanging on IO when fd is a pipe */
-	ts->rd->f_flags |= O_NONBLOCK;
+	/* Prevent workers from hanging on IO when fd is a pipe.
+	 * It's technically possible for userspace or concurrent mounts to
+	 * modify this flag concurrently, which will likely result in a
+	 * broken filesystem. However, just having bad flags here should
+	 * not crash the kernel or cause any other sort of bug, so mark this
+	 * particular data race as intentional so that tooling (like KCSAN)
+	 * can allow it and detect further problems.
+	 */
+	data_race(ts->rd->f_flags |= O_NONBLOCK);
 	ts->wr = fget(wfd);
 	if (!ts->wr)
 		goto out_put_rd;
 	if (!(ts->wr->f_mode & FMODE_WRITE))
 		goto out_put_wr;
-	ts->wr->f_flags |= O_NONBLOCK;
+	data_race(ts->wr->f_flags |= O_NONBLOCK);
 
 	client->trans = ts;
 	client->status = Connected;
-- 
2.42.0







[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Development Newbies]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux