6.5-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Shyam Prasad N <sprasad@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
commit c3326a61cdbf3ce1273d9198b6cbf90965d7e029 upstream.
We introduced a helper function to be used by non-cifsd threads to
mark the connection for reconnect. For multichannel, when only
a particular channel needs to be reconnected, this had a bug.
This change fixes that by marking that particular channel
for reconnect.
Fixes: dca65818c80c ("cifs: use a different reconnect helper for non-cifsd threads")
Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Shyam Prasad N <sprasad@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Paulo Alcantara (SUSE) <pc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Steve French <stfrench@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
fs/smb/client/connect.c | 9 +++++----
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
--- a/fs/smb/client/connect.c
+++ b/fs/smb/client/connect.c
@@ -156,13 +156,14 @@ cifs_signal_cifsd_for_reconnect(struct T
/* If server is a channel, select the primary channel */
pserver = CIFS_SERVER_IS_CHAN(server) ? server->primary_server : server;
- spin_lock(&pserver->srv_lock);
+ /* if we need to signal just this channel */
if (!all_channels) {
- pserver->tcpStatus = CifsNeedReconnect;
- spin_unlock(&pserver->srv_lock);
+ spin_lock(&server->srv_lock);
+ if (server->tcpStatus != CifsExiting)
+ server->tcpStatus = CifsNeedReconnect;
+ spin_unlock(&server->srv_lock);
return;
}
- spin_unlock(&pserver->srv_lock);
spin_lock(&cifs_tcp_ses_lock);
list_for_each_entry(ses, &pserver->smb_ses_list, smb_ses_list) {
