On 11/17/23 06:58, Guenter Roeck wrote:
On 11/16/23 23:41, Naresh Kamboju wrote:
On Fri, 17 Nov 2023 at 06:43, Guenter Roeck <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 11/15/23 12:44, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.201 release.
There are 191 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
let me know.
Responses should be made by Fri, 17 Nov 2023 20:46:03 +0000.
Anything received after that time might be too late.
Build results:
total: 159 pass: 155 fail: 4
Failed builds:
arm:allmodconfig
arm64:allmodconfig
i386:tools/perf
x86_64:tools/perf
Qemu test results:
total: 495 pass: 495 fail: 0
with:
Building arm64:allmodconfig ... failed
--------------
Error log:
drivers/interconnect/qcom/osm-l3.c:6:10: fatal error: linux/args.h:
No such file or directory
There is no linux/args.h in v5.10.y.
Caused by "interconnect: qcom: osm-l3: Replace custom implementation
of COUNT_ARGS()".
Also:
Building i386:tools/perf ... failed
util/evlist.c: In function ‘evlist__add_aux_dummy’:
util/evlist.c:269:24: error: implicit declaration of function
‘evlist__dummy_event’; did you mean ‘evsel__is_dummy_event’?
[-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
269 | struct evsel *evsel = evlist__dummy_event(evlist);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
| evsel__is_dummy_event
util/evlist.c:269:24: error: initialization of ‘struct evsel *’ from
‘int’ makes pointer from integer without a cast
There is indeed no 'evlist__dummy_event' function in v5.10.y.
This is with v5.10.200-192-g550b7e1fee20. I am a bit puzzled why others
don't seem to see those problems.
Thanks for reporting allmodconfig build failures.
My apologies.
The LKFT found allmodconfig failure lately due to infra issues /
timeouts,
the builds have been re-triggered manually.
arm:allmodconfig - FAILED
arm64:allmodconfig - FAILED
LKFT have stopped building perf on 5.x and 4.x branches, because we
reported several perf build issues and were not solved in the past.
Kind of makes (sad) sense; after all, I had stopped building perf on
4.14.y as well for the same reason. I'll do the same for 4.19.y and
for all 5.x branches.
FWIW, I will continue to build and test perf for all branches that I can
easily run on our test rack, which are all of them except 4.14.y and 4.19.y.
--
Florian
