Guenter Roeck wrote on Thu, Nov 16, 2023 at 05:13:39PM -0800: > Failed builds: > arm:allmodconfig > arm64:allmodconfig > i386:tools/perf > x86_64:tools/perf > This is with v5.10.200-192-g550b7e1fee20. I am a bit puzzled why others > don't seem to see those problems. The perf problem was reported by Florian Fainelli, but my current test build does not include userspace tools as we're not shipping them (and would rely on $distro packages when I need perf as a user rather than building it). Likewise, it looks like neither Linaro nor me build the qcom driver... I'm building kernels that have been trimmed down for our boards (with that exact config we're shipping and providing for our customers), and arm* drivers are especially fractured so it's a bit misleading to see "arm64 pass", that's just the tip of the actual setup tested. (Anyway, the main reason for me is mostly that $job is a small company that cannot afford extensive upstream testing, so I just don't have the time to do extended tests -- for the same reason we're only supporting the 5.10 tree so I'm focusing my limited time on just this branch, even if I'd love to do more. I'm just taking the stance that some test is better than no test and report back things we'd need to test before shipping customers a few weeks later anyway -- thank you for covering more!) -- Dominique Martinet | Asmadeus
