5.15-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Tyrel Datwyler <tyreld@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
[ Upstream commit 670106eb4c8b23475f8c2b3416005a312afa622f ]
Commit 0217a272fe13 ("scsi: ibmvfc: Store return code of H_FREE_SUB_CRQ
during cleanup") wrongly changed the busy loop check to use
rtas_busy_delay() instead of H_BUSY and H_IS_LONG_BUSY(). The busy return
codes for RTAS and hypercalls are not the same.
Fix this issue by restoring the use of H_BUSY and H_IS_LONG_BUSY().
Fixes: 0217a272fe13 ("scsi: ibmvfc: Store return code of H_FREE_SUB_CRQ during cleanup")
Signed-off-by: Tyrel Datwyler <tyreld@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230921225435.3537728-5-tyreld@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Reviewed-by: Brian King <brking@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Martin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/scsi/ibmvscsi/ibmvfc.c | 3 +--
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ibmvscsi/ibmvfc.c b/drivers/scsi/ibmvscsi/ibmvfc.c
index 45ef78f388dc9..d169ba772450f 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/ibmvscsi/ibmvfc.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/ibmvscsi/ibmvfc.c
@@ -22,7 +22,6 @@
#include <linux/bsg-lib.h>
#include <asm/firmware.h>
#include <asm/irq.h>
-#include <asm/rtas.h>
#include <asm/vio.h>
#include <scsi/scsi.h>
#include <scsi/scsi_cmnd.h>
@@ -5802,7 +5801,7 @@ static int ibmvfc_register_scsi_channel(struct ibmvfc_host *vhost,
irq_failed:
do {
rc = plpar_hcall_norets(H_FREE_SUB_CRQ, vdev->unit_address, scrq->cookie);
- } while (rtas_busy_delay(rc));
+ } while (rc == H_BUSY || H_IS_LONG_BUSY(rc));
reg_failed:
LEAVE;
return rc;
--
2.42.0
