5.10-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. ------------------ From: Yujie Liu <yujie.liu@xxxxxxxxx> [ Upstream commit f032c53bea6d2057c14553832d846be2f151cfb2 ] The order of descriptions should be consistent with the argument list of the function, so "kretprobe" should be the second one. int __kprobe_event_gen_cmd_start(struct dynevent_cmd *cmd, bool kretprobe, const char *name, const char *loc, ...) Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20231031041305.3363712-1-yujie.liu@xxxxxxxxx/ Fixes: 2a588dd1d5d6 ("tracing: Add kprobe event command generation functions") Suggested-by: Mukesh Ojha <quic_mojha@xxxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Yujie Liu <yujie.liu@xxxxxxxxx> Reviewed-by: Mukesh Ojha <quic_mojha@xxxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@xxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx> --- kernel/trace/trace_kprobe.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_kprobe.c b/kernel/trace/trace_kprobe.c index 37e1ec1d3ee54..7183572898998 100644 --- a/kernel/trace/trace_kprobe.c +++ b/kernel/trace/trace_kprobe.c @@ -949,9 +949,9 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kprobe_event_cmd_init); /** * __kprobe_event_gen_cmd_start - Generate a kprobe event command from arg list * @cmd: A pointer to the dynevent_cmd struct representing the new event + * @kretprobe: Is this a return probe? * @name: The name of the kprobe event * @loc: The location of the kprobe event - * @kretprobe: Is this a return probe? * @...: Variable number of arg (pairs), one pair for each field * * NOTE: Users normally won't want to call this function directly, but -- 2.42.0