6.6-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Shigeru Yoshida <syoshida@xxxxxxxxxx>
[ Upstream commit 34c4effacfc329aeca5635a69fd9e0f6c90b4101 ]
KMSAN reported the following uninit-value access issue:
=====================================================
BUG: KMSAN: uninit-value in virtio_transport_recv_pkt+0x1dfb/0x26a0 net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c:1421
virtio_transport_recv_pkt+0x1dfb/0x26a0 net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c:1421
vsock_loopback_work+0x3bb/0x5a0 net/vmw_vsock/vsock_loopback.c:120
process_one_work kernel/workqueue.c:2630 [inline]
process_scheduled_works+0xff6/0x1e60 kernel/workqueue.c:2703
worker_thread+0xeca/0x14d0 kernel/workqueue.c:2784
kthread+0x3cc/0x520 kernel/kthread.c:388
ret_from_fork+0x66/0x80 arch/x86/kernel/process.c:147
ret_from_fork_asm+0x11/0x20 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:304
Uninit was stored to memory at:
virtio_transport_space_update net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c:1274 [inline]
virtio_transport_recv_pkt+0x1ee8/0x26a0 net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c:1415
vsock_loopback_work+0x3bb/0x5a0 net/vmw_vsock/vsock_loopback.c:120
process_one_work kernel/workqueue.c:2630 [inline]
process_scheduled_works+0xff6/0x1e60 kernel/workqueue.c:2703
worker_thread+0xeca/0x14d0 kernel/workqueue.c:2784
kthread+0x3cc/0x520 kernel/kthread.c:388
ret_from_fork+0x66/0x80 arch/x86/kernel/process.c:147
ret_from_fork_asm+0x11/0x20 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:304
Uninit was created at:
slab_post_alloc_hook+0x105/0xad0 mm/slab.h:767
slab_alloc_node mm/slub.c:3478 [inline]
kmem_cache_alloc_node+0x5a2/0xaf0 mm/slub.c:3523
kmalloc_reserve+0x13c/0x4a0 net/core/skbuff.c:559
__alloc_skb+0x2fd/0x770 net/core/skbuff.c:650
alloc_skb include/linux/skbuff.h:1286 [inline]
virtio_vsock_alloc_skb include/linux/virtio_vsock.h:66 [inline]
virtio_transport_alloc_skb+0x90/0x11e0 net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c:58
virtio_transport_reset_no_sock net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c:957 [inline]
virtio_transport_recv_pkt+0x1279/0x26a0 net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c:1387
vsock_loopback_work+0x3bb/0x5a0 net/vmw_vsock/vsock_loopback.c:120
process_one_work kernel/workqueue.c:2630 [inline]
process_scheduled_works+0xff6/0x1e60 kernel/workqueue.c:2703
worker_thread+0xeca/0x14d0 kernel/workqueue.c:2784
kthread+0x3cc/0x520 kernel/kthread.c:388
ret_from_fork+0x66/0x80 arch/x86/kernel/process.c:147
ret_from_fork_asm+0x11/0x20 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:304
CPU: 1 PID: 10664 Comm: kworker/1:5 Not tainted 6.6.0-rc3-00146-g9f3ebbef746f #3
Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.16.2-1.fc38 04/01/2014
Workqueue: vsock-loopback vsock_loopback_work
=====================================================
The following simple reproducer can cause the issue described above:
int main(void)
{
int sock;
struct sockaddr_vm addr = {
.svm_family = AF_VSOCK,
.svm_cid = VMADDR_CID_ANY,
.svm_port = 1234,
};
sock = socket(AF_VSOCK, SOCK_STREAM, 0);
connect(sock, (struct sockaddr *)&addr, sizeof(addr));
return 0;
}
This issue occurs because the `buf_alloc` and `fwd_cnt` fields of the
`struct virtio_vsock_hdr` are not initialized when a new skb is allocated
in `virtio_transport_init_hdr()`. This patch resolves the issue by
initializing these fields during allocation.
Fixes: 71dc9ec9ac7d ("virtio/vsock: replace virtio_vsock_pkt with sk_buff")
Reported-and-tested-by: syzbot+0c8ce1da0ac31abbadcd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Closes: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=0c8ce1da0ac31abbadcd
Signed-off-by: Shigeru Yoshida <syoshida@xxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@xxxxxxxxxx>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231104150531.257952-1-syoshida@xxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c b/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c
index eb1465d506ef3..8bc272b6003bb 100644
--- a/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c
+++ b/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c
@@ -68,6 +68,8 @@ virtio_transport_alloc_skb(struct virtio_vsock_pkt_info *info,
hdr->dst_port = cpu_to_le32(dst_port);
hdr->flags = cpu_to_le32(info->flags);
hdr->len = cpu_to_le32(len);
+ hdr->buf_alloc = cpu_to_le32(0);
+ hdr->fwd_cnt = cpu_to_le32(0);
if (info->msg && len > 0) {
payload = skb_put(skb, len);
--
2.42.0
