6.6-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Maciej Wieczor-Retman <maciej.wieczor-retman@xxxxxxxxx>
[ Upstream commit 4d7f4e8158b62f63031510cdc24acc520956c091 ]
Compiling pidfd selftest after adding a __printf() attribute to
ksft_print_msg() and ksft_test_result_pass() exposes -Wformat warnings
in error_report(), test_pidfd_poll_exec_thread(),
child_poll_exec_test(), test_pidfd_poll_leader_exit_thread(),
child_poll_leader_exit_test().
The ksft_test_result_pass() in error_report() expects a string but
doesn't provide any argument after the format string. All the other
calls to ksft_print_msg() in the functions mentioned above have format
strings that don't match with other passed arguments.
Fix format specifiers so they match the passed variables.
Add a missing variable to ksft_test_result_pass() inside
error_report() so it matches other cases in the switch statement.
Fixes: 2def297ec7fb ("pidfd: add tests for NSpid info in fdinfo")
Signed-off-by: Maciej Wieczor-Retman <maciej.wieczor-retman@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
tools/testing/selftests/pidfd/pidfd_fdinfo_test.c | 2 +-
tools/testing/selftests/pidfd/pidfd_test.c | 12 ++++++------
2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/pidfd/pidfd_fdinfo_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/pidfd/pidfd_fdinfo_test.c
index 4e86f927880c3..01cc37bf611c3 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/pidfd/pidfd_fdinfo_test.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/pidfd/pidfd_fdinfo_test.c
@@ -62,7 +62,7 @@ static void error_report(struct error *err, const char *test_name)
break;
case PIDFD_PASS:
- ksft_test_result_pass("%s test: Passed\n");
+ ksft_test_result_pass("%s test: Passed\n", test_name);
break;
default:
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/pidfd/pidfd_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/pidfd/pidfd_test.c
index 00a07e7c571cd..c081ae91313aa 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/pidfd/pidfd_test.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/pidfd/pidfd_test.c
@@ -381,13 +381,13 @@ static int test_pidfd_send_signal_syscall_support(void)
static void *test_pidfd_poll_exec_thread(void *priv)
{
- ksft_print_msg("Child Thread: starting. pid %d tid %d ; and sleeping\n",
+ ksft_print_msg("Child Thread: starting. pid %d tid %ld ; and sleeping\n",
getpid(), syscall(SYS_gettid));
ksft_print_msg("Child Thread: doing exec of sleep\n");
execl("/bin/sleep", "sleep", str(CHILD_THREAD_MIN_WAIT), (char *)NULL);
- ksft_print_msg("Child Thread: DONE. pid %d tid %d\n",
+ ksft_print_msg("Child Thread: DONE. pid %d tid %ld\n",
getpid(), syscall(SYS_gettid));
return NULL;
}
@@ -427,7 +427,7 @@ static int child_poll_exec_test(void *args)
{
pthread_t t1;
- ksft_print_msg("Child (pidfd): starting. pid %d tid %d\n", getpid(),
+ ksft_print_msg("Child (pidfd): starting. pid %d tid %ld\n", getpid(),
syscall(SYS_gettid));
pthread_create(&t1, NULL, test_pidfd_poll_exec_thread, NULL);
/*
@@ -480,10 +480,10 @@ static void test_pidfd_poll_exec(int use_waitpid)
static void *test_pidfd_poll_leader_exit_thread(void *priv)
{
- ksft_print_msg("Child Thread: starting. pid %d tid %d ; and sleeping\n",
+ ksft_print_msg("Child Thread: starting. pid %d tid %ld ; and sleeping\n",
getpid(), syscall(SYS_gettid));
sleep(CHILD_THREAD_MIN_WAIT);
- ksft_print_msg("Child Thread: DONE. pid %d tid %d\n", getpid(), syscall(SYS_gettid));
+ ksft_print_msg("Child Thread: DONE. pid %d tid %ld\n", getpid(), syscall(SYS_gettid));
return NULL;
}
@@ -492,7 +492,7 @@ static int child_poll_leader_exit_test(void *args)
{
pthread_t t1, t2;
- ksft_print_msg("Child: starting. pid %d tid %d\n", getpid(), syscall(SYS_gettid));
+ ksft_print_msg("Child: starting. pid %d tid %ld\n", getpid(), syscall(SYS_gettid));
pthread_create(&t1, NULL, test_pidfd_poll_leader_exit_thread, NULL);
pthread_create(&t2, NULL, test_pidfd_poll_leader_exit_thread, NULL);
--
2.42.0
