6.6-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Artem Savkov <asavkov@xxxxxxxxxx>
[ Upstream commit 971f7c32147f2d0953a815a109b22b8ed45949d4 ]
This test relies on bpf_testmod, so skip it if the module is not available.
Fixes: aa3d65de4b900 ("bpf/selftests: Test fentry attachment to shadowed functions")
Signed-off-by: Artem Savkov <asavkov@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@xxxxxxxxxx>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20230914124928.340701-1-asavkov@xxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
.../testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/module_fentry_shadow.c | 5 +++++
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/module_fentry_shadow.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/module_fentry_shadow.c
index c7636e18b1ebd..aa9f67eb1c95b 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/module_fentry_shadow.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/module_fentry_shadow.c
@@ -61,6 +61,11 @@ void test_module_fentry_shadow(void)
int link_fd[2] = {};
__s32 btf_id[2] = {};
+ if (!env.has_testmod) {
+ test__skip();
+ return;
+ }
+
LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_prog_load_opts, load_opts,
.expected_attach_type = BPF_TRACE_FENTRY,
);
--
2.42.0
