Hi Ronald, debug.penguin32@xxxxxxxxx wrote on Tue, 14 Nov 2023 03:32:49 +1000: > Under heavy load it is likely that the controller is done > with its own task but the thread unlocking the wait is not > scheduled in time. Increasing IFC_TIMEOUT_MSECS allows the > controller to respond within allowable timeslice of 1 sec. > > fsl,ifc-nand 7e800000.nand: Controller is not responding > > [<804b2047>] (nand_get_device) from [<804b5335>] (nand_write_oob+0x1b/0x4a) > [<804b5335>] (nand_write_oob) from [<804a3585>] (mtd_write+0x41/0x5c) > [<804a3585>] (mtd_write) from [<804c1d47>] (ubi_io_write+0x17f/0x22c) > [<804c1d47>] (ubi_io_write) from [<804c047b>] (ubi_eba_write_leb+0x5b/0x1d0) > > Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx I believe the Fixes tag is the latest missing piece? > Signed-off-by: Ronald Monthero <debug.penguin32@xxxxxxxxx> > --- > drivers/mtd/nand/raw/fsl_ifc_nand.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/fsl_ifc_nand.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/fsl_ifc_nand.c > index 20bb1e0cb5eb..f0e2318ce088 100644 > --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/fsl_ifc_nand.c > +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/fsl_ifc_nand.c > @@ -21,7 +21,7 @@ > > #define ERR_BYTE 0xFF /* Value returned for read > bytes when read failed */ > -#define IFC_TIMEOUT_MSECS 500 /* Maximum number of mSecs to wait > +#define IFC_TIMEOUT_MSECS 1000 /* Maximum timeout to wait > for IFC NAND Machine */ > > struct fsl_ifc_ctrl; Thanks, Miquèl
