On Tue, Nov 07, 2023 at 08:07:59PM +0000, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 07, 2023 at 03:06:16PM -0500, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 07, 2023 at 07:35:37PM +0000, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> > > On Tue, Nov 07, 2023 at 10:18:05AM -0800, Stefan Roesch wrote:
> > > > +++ b/mm/huge_memory.c
> > > > @@ -2740,7 +2740,7 @@ int split_huge_page_to_list(struct page *page, struct list_head *list)
> > > > if (folio_test_swapbacked(folio)) {
> > > > __lruvec_stat_mod_folio(folio, NR_SHMEM_THPS,
> > > > -nr);
> > > > - } else {
> > > > + } else if (folio_test_pmd_mappable(folio)) {
> > > > __lruvec_stat_mod_folio(folio, NR_FILE_THPS,
> > > > -nr);
> > > > filemap_nr_thps_dec(mapping);
> > >
> > > As I said, we also need the folio_test_pmd_mappable() for swapbacked.
> > > Not because there's currently a problem, but because we don't leave
> > > landmines for other people to trip over in future!
> >
> > Do we need to fix filemap_unaccount_folio() as well?
>
> Looks to me like it is already correct?
>
> __lruvec_stat_mod_folio(folio, NR_FILE_PAGES, -nr);
> if (folio_test_swapbacked(folio)) {
> __lruvec_stat_mod_folio(folio, NR_SHMEM, -nr);
> if (folio_test_pmd_mappable(folio))
> __lruvec_stat_mod_folio(folio, NR_SHMEM_THPS, -nr);
> } else if (folio_test_pmd_mappable(folio)) {
> __lruvec_stat_mod_folio(folio, NR_FILE_THPS, -nr);
> filemap_nr_thps_dec(mapping);
> }
Argh, I overlooked it because it's nested further in due to that
NR_SHMEM update. Sorry about the noise.
