Hi Greg, On Tue, Oct 24, 2023 at 10:31 AM Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Mon, Oct 23, 2023 at 12:56:48PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote: > > On 10/23/23 11:50, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > > > CC maz > > > > > > On Mon, Oct 23, 2023 at 7:17 PM Daniel Díaz <daniel.diaz@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > On Mon, 23 Oct 2023 at 09:11, Daniel Díaz <daniel.diaz@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > On 23/10/23 4:55 a. m., Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > > > > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.15.137 release. > > > > > > There are 137 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > > > > > > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > > > > > > let me know. > > > > > > > > > > > > Responses should be made by Wed, 25 Oct 2023 10:47:57 +0000. > > > > > > Anything received after that time might be too late. > > > > > > > > > > > > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: > > > > > > https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.15.137-rc1.gz > > > > > > or in the git tree and branch at: > > > > > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.15.y > > > > > > and the diffstat can be found below. > > > > > > > > > > > > thanks, > > > > > > > > > > > > greg k-h > > > > > > > > > > We see lots of errors on Arm 32-bits: > > > > > > > > > > -----8<----- > > > > > /builds/linux/drivers/gpio/gpio-vf610.c:249:11: error: 'IRQCHIP_IMMUTABLE' undeclared here (not in a function); did you mean 'IS_IMMUTABLE'? > > > > > .flags = IRQCHIP_IMMUTABLE | IRQCHIP_MASK_ON_SUSPEND > > > > > ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > > > > > IS_IMMUTABLE > > > > > /builds/linux/drivers/gpio/gpio-vf610.c:251:2: error: 'GPIOCHIP_IRQ_RESOURCE_HELPERS' undeclared here (not in a function) > > > > > GPIOCHIP_IRQ_RESOURCE_HELPERS, > > > > > ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > > > > > /builds/linux/drivers/gpio/gpio-vf610.c:251:2: warning: excess elements in struct initializer > > > > > /builds/linux/drivers/gpio/gpio-vf610.c:251:2: note: (near initialization for 'vf610_irqchip') > > > > > /builds/linux/drivers/gpio/gpio-vf610.c: In function 'vf610_gpio_probe': > > > > > /builds/linux/drivers/gpio/gpio-vf610.c:340:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'gpio_irq_chip_set_chip'; did you mean 'gpiochip_get_data'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] > > > > > gpio_irq_chip_set_chip(girq, &vf610_irqchip); > > > > > ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > > > > > gpiochip_get_data > > > > > cc1: some warnings being treated as errors > > > > > ----->8----- > > > > > > > > Bisection points to "gpio: vf610: make irq_chip immutable" (upstream > > > > commit e6ef4f8ede09f4af7cde000717b349b50bc62576). > > > > > > IRQCHIP_IMMUTABLE was introduced in commit 6c846d026d490b23 ("gpio: > > > Don't fiddle with irqchips marked as immutable") in v5.19. > > > Backporting (part of) that is probably not safe. > > > > > > > In this context: What exactly does commit e6ef4f8ede09 fix that makes it > > a stable release candidate ? > > It is needed as a dependency for 430232619791 ("gpio: vf610: mask the > gpio irq in system suspend and support wakeup") which says it: > Fixes: 7f2691a19627 ("gpio: vf610: add gpiolib/IRQ chip driver for Vybrid") > which was in the 3.19 kernel release. > > That's why it was added. And then none of my x86 builds caught this > build failure before I pushed out the -rcs. Ah, the difference between semantic and lexical changes ;-) The proper backport would be to just add .flags = IRQCHIP_MASK_ON_SUSPEND | IRQCHIP_ENABLE_WAKEUP_ON_SUSPEND, Don't bother with the IRQCHIP_IMMUTABLE. Gr{oetje,eeting}s, Geert -- Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that. -- Linus Torvalds
