5.10-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
commit 32671e3799ca2e4590773fd0e63aaa4229e50c06 upstream.
Because group consistency is non-atomic between parent (filedesc) and children
(inherited) events, it is possible for PERF_FORMAT_GROUP read() to try and sum
non-matching counter groups -- with non-sensical results.
Add group_generation to distinguish the case where a parent group removes and
adds an event and thus has the same number, but a different configuration of
events as inherited groups.
This became a problem when commit fa8c269353d5 ("perf/core: Invert
perf_read_group() loops") flipped the order of child_list and sibling_list.
Previously it would iterate the group (sibling_list) first, and for each
sibling traverse the child_list. In this order, only the group composition of
the parent is relevant. By flipping the order the group composition of the
child (inherited) events becomes an issue and the mis-match in group
composition becomes evident.
That said; even prior to this commit, while reading of a group that is not
equally inherited was not broken, it still made no sense.
(Ab)use ECHILD as error return to indicate issues with child process group
composition.
Fixes: fa8c269353d5 ("perf/core: Invert perf_read_group() loops")
Reported-by: Budimir Markovic <markovicbudimir@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20231018115654.GK33217@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
include/linux/perf_event.h | 1 +
kernel/events/core.c | 39 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
2 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
--- a/include/linux/perf_event.h
+++ b/include/linux/perf_event.h
@@ -659,6 +659,7 @@ struct perf_event {
/* The cumulative AND of all event_caps for events in this group. */
int group_caps;
+ unsigned int group_generation;
struct perf_event *group_leader;
struct pmu *pmu;
void *pmu_private;
--- a/kernel/events/core.c
+++ b/kernel/events/core.c
@@ -2053,6 +2053,7 @@ static void perf_group_attach(struct per
list_add_tail(&event->sibling_list, &group_leader->sibling_list);
group_leader->nr_siblings++;
+ group_leader->group_generation++;
perf_event__header_size(group_leader);
@@ -2245,6 +2246,7 @@ static void perf_group_detach(struct per
if (leader != event) {
list_del_init(&event->sibling_list);
event->group_leader->nr_siblings--;
+ event->group_leader->group_generation++;
goto out;
}
@@ -5222,7 +5224,7 @@ static int __perf_read_group_add(struct
u64 read_format, u64 *values)
{
struct perf_event_context *ctx = leader->ctx;
- struct perf_event *sub;
+ struct perf_event *sub, *parent;
unsigned long flags;
int n = 1; /* skip @nr */
int ret;
@@ -5232,6 +5234,33 @@ static int __perf_read_group_add(struct
return ret;
raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&ctx->lock, flags);
+ /*
+ * Verify the grouping between the parent and child (inherited)
+ * events is still in tact.
+ *
+ * Specifically:
+ * - leader->ctx->lock pins leader->sibling_list
+ * - parent->child_mutex pins parent->child_list
+ * - parent->ctx->mutex pins parent->sibling_list
+ *
+ * Because parent->ctx != leader->ctx (and child_list nests inside
+ * ctx->mutex), group destruction is not atomic between children, also
+ * see perf_event_release_kernel(). Additionally, parent can grow the
+ * group.
+ *
+ * Therefore it is possible to have parent and child groups in a
+ * different configuration and summing over such a beast makes no sense
+ * what so ever.
+ *
+ * Reject this.
+ */
+ parent = leader->parent;
+ if (parent &&
+ (parent->group_generation != leader->group_generation ||
+ parent->nr_siblings != leader->nr_siblings)) {
+ ret = -ECHILD;
+ goto unlock;
+ }
/*
* Since we co-schedule groups, {enabled,running} times of siblings
@@ -5261,8 +5290,9 @@ static int __perf_read_group_add(struct
values[n++] = primary_event_id(sub);
}
+unlock:
raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ctx->lock, flags);
- return 0;
+ return ret;
}
static int perf_read_group(struct perf_event *event,
@@ -5281,10 +5311,6 @@ static int perf_read_group(struct perf_e
values[0] = 1 + leader->nr_siblings;
- /*
- * By locking the child_mutex of the leader we effectively
- * lock the child list of all siblings.. XXX explain how.
- */
mutex_lock(&leader->child_mutex);
ret = __perf_read_group_add(leader, read_format, values);
@@ -12820,6 +12846,7 @@ static int inherit_group(struct perf_eve
!perf_get_aux_event(child_ctr, leader))
return -EINVAL;
}
+ leader->group_generation = parent_event->group_generation;
return 0;
}
