5.10-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Alexander Stein <alexander.stein@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
[ Upstream commit e6ef4f8ede09f4af7cde000717b349b50bc62576 ]
Since recently, the kernel is nagging about mutable irq_chips:
"not an immutable chip, please consider fixing it!"
Drop the unneeded copy, flag it as IRQCHIP_IMMUTABLE, add the new
helper functions and call the appropriate gpiolib functions.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Stein <alexander.stein@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@xxxxxxxxxx>
Stable-dep-of: 430232619791 ("gpio: vf610: mask the gpio irq in system suspend and support wakeup")
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/gpio/gpio-vf610.c | 41 ++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-vf610.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-vf610.c
index c2c38f13801f5..a548ac3fbb207 100644
--- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-vf610.c
+++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-vf610.c
@@ -29,7 +29,6 @@ struct fsl_gpio_soc_data {
struct vf610_gpio_port {
struct gpio_chip gc;
- struct irq_chip ic;
void __iomem *base;
void __iomem *gpio_base;
const struct fsl_gpio_soc_data *sdata;
@@ -206,20 +205,24 @@ static int vf610_gpio_irq_set_type(struct irq_data *d, u32 type)
static void vf610_gpio_irq_mask(struct irq_data *d)
{
- struct vf610_gpio_port *port =
- gpiochip_get_data(irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d));
- void __iomem *pcr_base = port->base + PORT_PCR(d->hwirq);
+ struct gpio_chip *gc = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d);
+ struct vf610_gpio_port *port = gpiochip_get_data(gc);
+ irq_hw_number_t gpio_num = irqd_to_hwirq(d);
+ void __iomem *pcr_base = port->base + PORT_PCR(gpio_num);
vf610_gpio_writel(0, pcr_base);
+ gpiochip_disable_irq(gc, gpio_num);
}
static void vf610_gpio_irq_unmask(struct irq_data *d)
{
- struct vf610_gpio_port *port =
- gpiochip_get_data(irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d));
- void __iomem *pcr_base = port->base + PORT_PCR(d->hwirq);
+ struct gpio_chip *gc = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d);
+ struct vf610_gpio_port *port = gpiochip_get_data(gc);
+ irq_hw_number_t gpio_num = irqd_to_hwirq(d);
+ void __iomem *pcr_base = port->base + PORT_PCR(gpio_num);
- vf610_gpio_writel(port->irqc[d->hwirq] << PORT_PCR_IRQC_OFFSET,
+ gpiochip_enable_irq(gc, gpio_num);
+ vf610_gpio_writel(port->irqc[gpio_num] << PORT_PCR_IRQC_OFFSET,
pcr_base);
}
@@ -236,6 +239,17 @@ static int vf610_gpio_irq_set_wake(struct irq_data *d, u32 enable)
return 0;
}
+static const struct irq_chip vf610_irqchip = {
+ .name = "gpio-vf610",
+ .irq_ack = vf610_gpio_irq_ack,
+ .irq_mask = vf610_gpio_irq_mask,
+ .irq_unmask = vf610_gpio_irq_unmask,
+ .irq_set_type = vf610_gpio_irq_set_type,
+ .irq_set_wake = vf610_gpio_irq_set_wake,
+ .flags = IRQCHIP_IMMUTABLE,
+ GPIOCHIP_IRQ_RESOURCE_HELPERS,
+};
+
static void vf610_gpio_disable_clk(void *data)
{
clk_disable_unprepare(data);
@@ -248,7 +262,6 @@ static int vf610_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
struct vf610_gpio_port *port;
struct gpio_chip *gc;
struct gpio_irq_chip *girq;
- struct irq_chip *ic;
int i;
int ret;
@@ -315,14 +328,6 @@ static int vf610_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
gc->direction_output = vf610_gpio_direction_output;
gc->set = vf610_gpio_set;
- ic = &port->ic;
- ic->name = "gpio-vf610";
- ic->irq_ack = vf610_gpio_irq_ack;
- ic->irq_mask = vf610_gpio_irq_mask;
- ic->irq_unmask = vf610_gpio_irq_unmask;
- ic->irq_set_type = vf610_gpio_irq_set_type;
- ic->irq_set_wake = vf610_gpio_irq_set_wake;
-
/* Mask all GPIO interrupts */
for (i = 0; i < gc->ngpio; i++)
vf610_gpio_writel(0, port->base + PORT_PCR(i));
@@ -331,7 +336,7 @@ static int vf610_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
vf610_gpio_writel(~0, port->base + PORT_ISFR);
girq = &gc->irq;
- girq->chip = ic;
+ gpio_irq_chip_set_chip(girq, &vf610_irqchip);
girq->parent_handler = vf610_gpio_irq_handler;
girq->num_parents = 1;
girq->parents = devm_kcalloc(&pdev->dev, 1,
--
2.42.0
