6.1-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Gavrilov Ilia <Ilia.Gavrilov@xxxxxxxxxxx>
commit 1d30162f35c7a73fc2f8cdcdcdbd690bedb99d1a upstream.
Device flags are displayed incorrectly:
1) The comparison (i == F_FLOW_SEQ) is always false, because F_FLOW_SEQ
is equal to (1 << FLOW_SEQ_SHIFT) == 2048, and the maximum value
of the 'i' variable is (NR_PKT_FLAG - 1) == 17. It should be compared
with FLOW_SEQ_SHIFT.
2) Similarly to the F_IPSEC flag.
3) Also add spaces to the print end of the string literal "spi:%u"
to prevent the output from merging with the flag that follows.
Found by InfoTeCS on behalf of Linux Verification Center
(linuxtesting.org) with SVACE.
Fixes: 99c6d3d20d62 ("pktgen: Remove brute-force printing of flags")
Signed-off-by: Gavrilov Ilia <Ilia.Gavrilov@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
net/core/pktgen.c | 14 +++++++-------
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
--- a/net/core/pktgen.c
+++ b/net/core/pktgen.c
@@ -669,19 +669,19 @@ static int pktgen_if_show(struct seq_fil
seq_puts(seq, " Flags: ");
for (i = 0; i < NR_PKT_FLAGS; i++) {
- if (i == F_FLOW_SEQ)
+ if (i == FLOW_SEQ_SHIFT)
if (!pkt_dev->cflows)
continue;
- if (pkt_dev->flags & (1 << i))
+ if (pkt_dev->flags & (1 << i)) {
seq_printf(seq, "%s ", pkt_flag_names[i]);
- else if (i == F_FLOW_SEQ)
- seq_puts(seq, "FLOW_RND ");
-
#ifdef CONFIG_XFRM
- if (i == F_IPSEC && pkt_dev->spi)
- seq_printf(seq, "spi:%u", pkt_dev->spi);
+ if (i == IPSEC_SHIFT && pkt_dev->spi)
+ seq_printf(seq, "spi:%u ", pkt_dev->spi);
#endif
+ } else if (i == FLOW_SEQ_SHIFT) {
+ seq_puts(seq, "FLOW_RND ");
+ }
}
seq_puts(seq, "\n");
