[PATCH 6.5 059/241] fprobe: Fix to ensure the number of active retprobes is not zero

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



6.5-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@xxxxxxxxxx>

commit 700b2b439766e8aab8a7174991198497345bd411 upstream.

The number of active retprobes can be zero but it is not acceptable,
so return EINVAL error if detected.

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/169750018550.186853.11198884812017796410.stgit@devnote2/

Reported-by: wuqiang.matt <wuqiang.matt@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20231016222103.cb9f426edc60220eabd8aa6a@xxxxxxxxxx/
Fixes: 5b0ab78998e3 ("fprobe: Add exit_handler support")
Signed-off-by: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 kernel/trace/fprobe.c |    6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

--- a/kernel/trace/fprobe.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/fprobe.c
@@ -189,7 +189,7 @@ static int fprobe_init_rethook(struct fp
 {
 	int i, size;
 
-	if (num < 0)
+	if (num <= 0)
 		return -EINVAL;
 
 	if (!fp->exit_handler) {
@@ -202,8 +202,8 @@ static int fprobe_init_rethook(struct fp
 		size = fp->nr_maxactive;
 	else
 		size = num * num_possible_cpus() * 2;
-	if (size < 0)
-		return -E2BIG;
+	if (size <= 0)
+		return -EINVAL;
 
 	fp->rethook = rethook_alloc((void *)fp, fprobe_exit_handler);
 	if (!fp->rethook)





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Development Newbies]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux