5.10-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
[ Upstream commit f15f29fd4779be8a418b66e9d52979bb6d6c2325 ]
Chain binding only requires the rule addition/insertion command within
the same transaction. Removal of rules from chain bindings within the
same transaction makes no sense, userspace does not utilize this
feature. Replace nft_chain_is_bound() check to nft_chain_binding() in
rule deletion commands. Replace command implies a rule deletion, reject
this command too.
Rule flush command can also safely rely on this nft_chain_binding()
check because unbound chains are not allowed since 62e1e94b246e
("netfilter: nf_tables: reject unbound chain set before commit phase").
Fixes: d0e2c7de92c7 ("netfilter: nf_tables: add NFT_CHAIN_BINDING")
Reported-by: Kevin Rich <kevinrich1337@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c | 18 +++++++++++++-----
1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c b/net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c
index 16e2500e8590b..78b268bd7f012 100644
--- a/net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c
+++ b/net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c
@@ -1268,7 +1268,7 @@ static int nft_flush_table(struct nft_ctx *ctx)
if (!nft_is_active_next(ctx->net, chain))
continue;
- if (nft_chain_is_bound(chain))
+ if (nft_chain_binding(chain))
continue;
ctx->chain = chain;
@@ -1312,7 +1312,7 @@ static int nft_flush_table(struct nft_ctx *ctx)
if (!nft_is_active_next(ctx->net, chain))
continue;
- if (nft_chain_is_bound(chain))
+ if (nft_chain_binding(chain))
continue;
ctx->chain = chain;
@@ -2599,6 +2599,9 @@ static int nf_tables_delchain(struct net *net, struct sock *nlsk,
return PTR_ERR(chain);
}
+ if (nft_chain_binding(chain))
+ return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+
if (nlh->nlmsg_flags & NLM_F_NONREC &&
chain->use > 0)
return -EBUSY;
@@ -3498,6 +3501,11 @@ static int nf_tables_newrule(struct net *net, struct sock *nlsk,
}
if (nlh->nlmsg_flags & NLM_F_REPLACE) {
+ if (nft_chain_binding(chain)) {
+ err = -EOPNOTSUPP;
+ goto err_destroy_flow_rule;
+ }
+
trans = nft_trans_rule_add(&ctx, NFT_MSG_NEWRULE, rule);
if (trans == NULL) {
err = -ENOMEM;
@@ -3606,7 +3614,7 @@ static int nf_tables_delrule(struct net *net, struct sock *nlsk,
NL_SET_BAD_ATTR(extack, nla[NFTA_RULE_CHAIN]);
return PTR_ERR(chain);
}
- if (nft_chain_is_bound(chain))
+ if (nft_chain_binding(chain))
return -EOPNOTSUPP;
}
@@ -3636,7 +3644,7 @@ static int nf_tables_delrule(struct net *net, struct sock *nlsk,
list_for_each_entry(chain, &table->chains, list) {
if (!nft_is_active_next(net, chain))
continue;
- if (nft_chain_is_bound(chain))
+ if (nft_chain_binding(chain))
continue;
ctx.chain = chain;
@@ -9529,7 +9537,7 @@ static void __nft_release_table(struct net *net, struct nft_table *table)
ctx.family = table->family;
ctx.table = table;
list_for_each_entry(chain, &table->chains, list) {
- if (nft_chain_is_bound(chain))
+ if (nft_chain_binding(chain))
continue;
ctx.chain = chain;
--
2.40.1
