5.10-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@xxxxxxxxxx>
[ Upstream commit 01b057b2f4cc2d905a0bd92195657dbd9a7005ab ]
If the user has requested no SRSO mitigation, other mitigations can use
the lighter-weight SBPB instead of IBPB.
Fixes: fb3bd914b3ec ("x86/srso: Add a Speculative RAS Overflow mitigation")
Signed-off-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov (AMD) <bp@xxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Borislav Petkov (AMD) <bp@xxxxxxxxx>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/b20820c3cfd1003171135ec8d762a0b957348497.1693889988.git.jpoimboe@xxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs.c
index 4719089029f02..ec3ddb9a456ba 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs.c
@@ -2344,7 +2344,7 @@ static void __init srso_select_mitigation(void)
switch (srso_cmd) {
case SRSO_CMD_OFF:
- return;
+ goto pred_cmd;
case SRSO_CMD_MICROCODE:
if (has_microcode) {
--
2.40.1
