5.10-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Lukas Bulwahn <lukas.bulwahn@xxxxxxxxx>
[ Upstream commit afcc4e32f606dbfb47aa7309172c89174b86e74c ]
As commit 6920b3913235 ("ext4: add new helper interface
ext4_try_to_trim_range()") moves some code into the separate function
ext4_try_to_trim_range(), the use of the variable ret within that
function is more limited and can be adjusted as well.
Scope the use of the variable ret locally and drop dead assignments.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Lukas Bulwahn <lukas.bulwahn@xxxxxxxxx>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210820120853.23134-1-lukas.bulwahn@xxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@xxxxxxx>
Stable-dep-of: 45e4ab320c9b ("ext4: move setting of trimmed bit into ext4_try_to_trim_range()")
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
fs/ext4/mballoc.c | 5 ++---
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/ext4/mballoc.c b/fs/ext4/mballoc.c
index 54c718d471978..e0428cec6ff60 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/mballoc.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/mballoc.c
@@ -5900,7 +5900,6 @@ static int ext4_try_to_trim_range(struct super_block *sb,
{
ext4_grpblk_t next, count, free_count;
void *bitmap;
- int ret = 0;
bitmap = e4b->bd_bitmap;
start = (e4b->bd_info->bb_first_free > start) ?
@@ -5915,10 +5914,10 @@ static int ext4_try_to_trim_range(struct super_block *sb,
next = mb_find_next_bit(bitmap, max + 1, start);
if ((next - start) >= minblocks) {
- ret = ext4_trim_extent(sb, start, next - start, e4b);
+ int ret = ext4_trim_extent(sb, start, next - start, e4b);
+
if (ret && ret != -EOPNOTSUPP)
break;
- ret = 0;
count += next - start;
}
free_count += next - start;
--
2.40.1
