From: Chengfeng Ye <dg573847474@xxxxxxxxx>
[ Upstream commit 9e8bc2dda5a7a8e2babc9975f4b11c9a6196e490 ]
As timbgpio_irq_enable()/timbgpio_irq_disable() callback could be
executed under irq context, it could introduce double locks on
&tgpio->lock if it preempts other execution units requiring
the same locks.
timbgpio_gpio_set()
--> timbgpio_update_bit()
--> spin_lock(&tgpio->lock)
<interrupt>
--> timbgpio_irq_disable()
--> spin_lock_irqsave(&tgpio->lock)
This flaw was found by an experimental static analysis tool I am
developing for irq-related deadlock.
To prevent the potential deadlock, the patch uses spin_lock_irqsave()
on &tgpio->lock inside timbgpio_gpio_set() to prevent the possible
deadlock scenario.
Signed-off-by: Chengfeng Ye <dg573847474@xxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/gpio/gpio-timberdale.c | 5 +++--
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-timberdale.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-timberdale.c
index 314e300d6ba33..1e6925c27ae29 100644
--- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-timberdale.c
+++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-timberdale.c
@@ -55,9 +55,10 @@ static int timbgpio_update_bit(struct gpio_chip *gpio, unsigned index,
unsigned offset, bool enabled)
{
struct timbgpio *tgpio = gpiochip_get_data(gpio);
+ unsigned long flags;
u32 reg;
- spin_lock(&tgpio->lock);
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&tgpio->lock, flags);
reg = ioread32(tgpio->membase + offset);
if (enabled)
@@ -66,7 +67,7 @@ static int timbgpio_update_bit(struct gpio_chip *gpio, unsigned index,
reg &= ~(1 << index);
iowrite32(reg, tgpio->membase + offset);
- spin_unlock(&tgpio->lock);
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&tgpio->lock, flags);
return 0;
}
--
2.40.1
