Re: kernel BUG at fs/ext4/inode.c:1914 - page_buffers()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hello!

On Thu 05-10-23 09:08:50, Mathieu Othacehe wrote:
> > Backporting the series would be ideal. Is this only for the 5.15 kernel?
> 
> OK. I spotted it on a 5.15 but as far as I understand, this affects all
> stables with 5c48a7df9149, i.e all stables. Is that correct Jan?

Yes, that is correct. Also I have realized that before patches I've already
mentioned are applicable, you will also need to pick up:

9462f770eda8 ("ext4: Update stale comment about write constraints")
c8e8e16dbbf0 ("ext4: Use nr_to_write directly in mpage_prepare_extent_to_map()")
3f5d30636d2a ("ext4: Mark page for delayed dirtying only if it is pinned")
f1496362e9d7 ("ext4: Don't unlock page in ext4_bio_write_page()")
eaf2ca10ca4b ("ext4: Move page unlocking out of mpage_submit_page()")
d8be7607de03 ("ext4: Move mpage_page_done() calls after error handling")
3f079114bf52 ("ext4: Convert data=journal writeback to use ext4_writepages()")
e6c28a26b799 ("ext4: Fix warnings when freezing filesystem with journaled data")
  This commit actually gets reverted in the series of patches I have
already mentioned.

So sadly the backport is even larger than what I originally thought.

								Honza
-- 
Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxxx>
SUSE Labs, CR



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Development Newbies]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux