6.5-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. ------------------ From: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@xxxxxxxxxx> commit 9f1a98813b4b686482e5ef3c9d998581cace0ba6 upstream. On incoming TCP reset, subflow closing could happen before error propagation. That in turn could cause the socket error being ignored, and a missing socket state transition, as reported by Daire-Byrne. Address the issues explicitly checking for subflow socket error at close time. To avoid code duplication, factor-out of __mptcp_error_report() a new helper implementing the relevant bits. Closes: https://github.com/multipath-tcp/mptcp_net-next/issues/429 Fixes: 15cc10453398 ("mptcp: deliver ssk errors to msk") Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@xxxxxxxxxx> Reviewed-by: Mat Martineau <martineau@xxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Matthieu Baerts <matthieu.baerts@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- net/mptcp/protocol.c | 63 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------------ 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-) --- a/net/mptcp/protocol.c +++ b/net/mptcp/protocol.c @@ -772,40 +772,44 @@ static bool __mptcp_ofo_queue(struct mpt return moved; } -void __mptcp_error_report(struct sock *sk) +static bool __mptcp_subflow_error_report(struct sock *sk, struct sock *ssk) { - struct mptcp_subflow_context *subflow; - struct mptcp_sock *msk = mptcp_sk(sk); + int err = sock_error(ssk); + int ssk_state; - mptcp_for_each_subflow(msk, subflow) { - struct sock *ssk = mptcp_subflow_tcp_sock(subflow); - int err = sock_error(ssk); - int ssk_state; + if (!err) + return false; - if (!err) - continue; + /* only propagate errors on fallen-back sockets or + * on MPC connect + */ + if (sk->sk_state != TCP_SYN_SENT && !__mptcp_check_fallback(mptcp_sk(sk))) + return false; - /* only propagate errors on fallen-back sockets or - * on MPC connect - */ - if (sk->sk_state != TCP_SYN_SENT && !__mptcp_check_fallback(msk)) - continue; + /* We need to propagate only transition to CLOSE state. + * Orphaned socket will see such state change via + * subflow_sched_work_if_closed() and that path will properly + * destroy the msk as needed. + */ + ssk_state = inet_sk_state_load(ssk); + if (ssk_state == TCP_CLOSE && !sock_flag(sk, SOCK_DEAD)) + inet_sk_state_store(sk, ssk_state); + WRITE_ONCE(sk->sk_err, -err); + + /* This barrier is coupled with smp_rmb() in mptcp_poll() */ + smp_wmb(); + sk_error_report(sk); + return true; +} - /* We need to propagate only transition to CLOSE state. - * Orphaned socket will see such state change via - * subflow_sched_work_if_closed() and that path will properly - * destroy the msk as needed. - */ - ssk_state = inet_sk_state_load(ssk); - if (ssk_state == TCP_CLOSE && !sock_flag(sk, SOCK_DEAD)) - inet_sk_state_store(sk, ssk_state); - WRITE_ONCE(sk->sk_err, -err); - - /* This barrier is coupled with smp_rmb() in mptcp_poll() */ - smp_wmb(); - sk_error_report(sk); - break; - } +void __mptcp_error_report(struct sock *sk) +{ + struct mptcp_subflow_context *subflow; + struct mptcp_sock *msk = mptcp_sk(sk); + + mptcp_for_each_subflow(msk, subflow) + if (__mptcp_subflow_error_report(sk, mptcp_subflow_tcp_sock(subflow))) + break; } /* In most cases we will be able to lock the mptcp socket. If its already @@ -2417,6 +2421,7 @@ static void __mptcp_close_ssk(struct soc } out_release: + __mptcp_subflow_error_report(sk, ssk); release_sock(ssk); sock_put(ssk);
