[PATCH 6.5 121/321] bus: ti-sysc: Use fsleep() instead of usleep_range() in sysc_reset()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



6.5-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Julien Panis <jpanis@xxxxxxxxxxxx>

[ Upstream commit d929b2b7464f95ec01e47f560b1e687482ba8929 ]

The am335x-evm started producing boot errors because of subtle timing
changes:

Unhandled fault: external abort on non-linefetch (0x1008) at 0xf03c1010
...
sysc_reset from sysc_probe+0xf60/0x1514
sysc_probe from platform_probe+0x5c/0xbc
...

The fix consists in using the appropriate sleep function in sysc reset.
For flexible sleeping, fsleep is recommended. Here, sysc delay parameter
can take any value in [0 - 255] us range. As a result, fsleep() should
be used, calling udelay() for a sysc delay lower than 10 us.

Signed-off-by: Julien Panis <jpanis@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Fixes: e709ed70d122 ("bus: ti-sysc: Fix missing reset delay handling")
Message-ID: <20230821-fix-ti-sysc-reset-v1-1-5a0a5d8fae55@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
 drivers/bus/ti-sysc.c | 3 +--
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/bus/ti-sysc.c b/drivers/bus/ti-sysc.c
index 9766dbf607f97..76116a9f6f87e 100644
--- a/drivers/bus/ti-sysc.c
+++ b/drivers/bus/ti-sysc.c
@@ -2149,8 +2149,7 @@ static int sysc_reset(struct sysc *ddata)
 	}
 
 	if (ddata->cfg.srst_udelay)
-		usleep_range(ddata->cfg.srst_udelay,
-			     ddata->cfg.srst_udelay * 2);
+		fsleep(ddata->cfg.srst_udelay);
 
 	if (ddata->post_reset_quirk)
 		ddata->post_reset_quirk(ddata);
-- 
2.40.1






[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Development Newbies]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux