6.5-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
[ Upstream commit 837723b22a63cfbff584655b009b9d488d0e9087 ]
bpf_nf testcase fails on s390x: bpf_skb_ct_lookup() cannot find the entry
that was added by bpf_ct_insert_entry() within the same BPF function.
The reason is that this entry is deleted by nf_ct_gc_expired().
The CT timeout starts ticking after the CT confirmation; therefore
nf_conn.timeout is initially set to the timeout value, and
__nf_conntrack_confirm() sets it to the deadline value.
bpf_ct_insert_entry() sets IPS_CONFIRMED_BIT, but does not adjust the
timeout, making its value meaningless and causing false positives.
Fix the problem by making bpf_ct_insert_entry() adjust the timeout,
like __nf_conntrack_confirm().
Fixes: 2cdaa3eefed8 ("netfilter: conntrack: restore IPS_CONFIRMED out of nf_conntrack_hash_check_insert()")
Signed-off-by: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Florian Westphal <fw@xxxxxxxxx>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20230830011128.1415752-3-iii@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_bpf.c | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_bpf.c b/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_bpf.c
index 0d36d7285e3f0..747dc22655018 100644
--- a/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_bpf.c
+++ b/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_bpf.c
@@ -380,6 +380,8 @@ __bpf_kfunc struct nf_conn *bpf_ct_insert_entry(struct nf_conn___init *nfct_i)
struct nf_conn *nfct = (struct nf_conn *)nfct_i;
int err;
+ if (!nf_ct_is_confirmed(nfct))
+ nfct->timeout += nfct_time_stamp;
nfct->status |= IPS_CONFIRMED;
err = nf_conntrack_hash_check_insert(nfct);
if (err < 0) {
--
2.40.1
