kernel test robot <lkp@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > Hi, > > Thanks for your patch. > > FYI: kernel test robot notices the stable kernel rule is not satisfied. > > The check is based on https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/stable-kernel-rules.html/#option-1 > > Rule: add the tag "Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" in the sign-off area to have the patch automatically included in the stable tree. > Subject: [PATCH] binfmt_elf: Support segments with 0 filesz and misaligned starts > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/stable/87jzsemmsd.fsf_-_%40email.froward.int.ebiederm.org My apologies kernel test robot I had realized stable was cc'd on this conversation. This patch as is, is most definitely not stable fodder. Maybe after being tested. It is definitely not a regression fix, and I am not certain even after being tested it could be considered a fix rather than just a new feature. AKA "Support very weird compiler generated exectuables". Eric
