On Wed, Sep 20, 2023 at 9:55 AM Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Wed 20-09-23 08:32:42, Shakeel Butt wrote: > > Also I don't think reverting 58056f77502f would give any benefit. > > Not reverting 58056f77502f would re-introduce the regression in some > non-patched versions of Docker runtimes which cannot handle ENOTSUPP. > So I think we need to revert both or none of them. I would prefer the > later (option 1) as the fix is trivial but I do understand headache > of chasing all those outdated deployments or vendor code forks. I think that would be too much conservative an approach but I don't have a strong opinion against it. Also just to be clear we are not talking about full revert of 58056f77502f but just the returning of EOPNOTSUPP, right?
