[PATCH 5.4 190/367] RDMA/siw: Correct wrong debug message

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



5.4-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Guoqing Jiang <guoqing.jiang@xxxxxxxxx>

[ Upstream commit bee024d20451e4ce04ea30099cad09f7f75d288b ]

We need to print num_sle first then pbl->max_buf per the condition.
Also replace mem->pbl with pbl while at it.

Fixes: 303ae1cdfdf7 ("rdma/siw: application interface")
Signed-off-by: Guoqing Jiang <guoqing.jiang@xxxxxxxxx>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230821133255.31111-3-guoqing.jiang@xxxxxxxxx
Acked-by: Bernard Metzler <bmt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Leon Romanovsky <leon@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
 drivers/infiniband/sw/siw/siw_verbs.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/sw/siw/siw_verbs.c b/drivers/infiniband/sw/siw/siw_verbs.c
index c8c2014b79d22..236f9efaa75ce 100644
--- a/drivers/infiniband/sw/siw/siw_verbs.c
+++ b/drivers/infiniband/sw/siw/siw_verbs.c
@@ -1509,7 +1509,7 @@ int siw_map_mr_sg(struct ib_mr *base_mr, struct scatterlist *sl, int num_sle,
 
 	if (pbl->max_buf < num_sle) {
 		siw_dbg_mem(mem, "too many SGE's: %d > %d\n",
-			    mem->pbl->max_buf, num_sle);
+			    num_sle, pbl->max_buf);
 		return -ENOMEM;
 	}
 	for_each_sg(sl, slp, num_sle, i) {
-- 
2.40.1






[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Development Newbies]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux