On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 03:53:49PM -0800, Brian Norris wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 01:34:24PM +0900, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > The patch below does not apply to the 3.17-stable tree.
> > If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm
> > tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit
> > id to <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>.
>
> Did you follow the annotations in the commit message? The Canonical-run
> 3.16.x stable seemed to pick them up just fine. Or did I get the syntax
> wrong? (I still owe you an update to
> Documentation/stable-kernel-rules.txt, by the way.)
>
> > ------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------
> >
> > From a5b7616c55e188fe3d6ef686bef402d4703ecb62 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> ...
> > Fixes: 03e296f613af ("mtd: m25p80: use the SPI nor framework")
> > Cc: <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> # 3.16.x: 32f1b7c8352f: mtd: move support for struct flash_platform_data into m25p80
> > Cc: <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> # 3.16.x: 90e55b3812a1: mtd: m25p80: get rid of spi_get_device_id
> > Cc: <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> # 3.16.x: 70f3ce0510af: mtd: spi-nor: make spi_nor_scan() take a chip type name, not spi_device_id
> > Cc: <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> # 3.16.x
>
> I am able to successfully checkout your linux-3.17.y and:
>
> git cherry-pick 32f1b7c8352f
> git cherry-pick 90e55b3812a1
> git cherry-pick 70f3ce0510af
> git cherry-pick a5b7616c55e1
That all seems to be a ton of churn for a stable kernel patch,
especially something as "simple" as a module alias, don't you agree?
That's why I wouldn't apply all of those patches, sorry.
thanks,
greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html