Hi Greg,
I am not sure why this error messages was generated.
Current patch fixes: b4b491c083 (iio: accel: kxcjk-1013: Support
threshold) but this commit doesn't seem to be in 3.17 stable kernel.
Daniel.
On 11/10/2014 06:22 AM, gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
The patch below does not apply to the 3.17-stable tree.
If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm
tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit
id to <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>.
thanks,
greg k-h
------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------
From 25afffe16d07909197f99163ca7cd1f80fb5cbdd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Daniel Baluta <daniel.baluta@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2014 15:53:00 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] io: accel: kxcjk-1013: Fix iio_event_spec direction
Because IIO_EV_DIR_* are not bitmasks but enums,
IIO_EV_DIR_RISING | IIO_EV_DIR_FALLING is not equal
with IIO_EV_DIR_EITHER.
This could lead to potential misformatted sysfs attributes
like:
* in_accel_x_thresh_(null)_en
* in_accel_x_thresh_(null)_period
* in_accel_x_thresh_(null)_value
or even memory corruption.
Fixes: b4b491c083 (iio: accel: kxcjk-1013: Support threshold)
Signed-off-by: Daniel Baluta <daniel.baluta@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: <Stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@xxxxxxxxxx>
diff --git a/drivers/iio/accel/kxcjk-1013.c b/drivers/iio/accel/kxcjk-1013.c
index 98909a9e284e..a23e58c4ed99 100644
--- a/drivers/iio/accel/kxcjk-1013.c
+++ b/drivers/iio/accel/kxcjk-1013.c
@@ -894,7 +894,7 @@ static const struct attribute_group kxcjk1013_attrs_group = {
static const struct iio_event_spec kxcjk1013_event = {
.type = IIO_EV_TYPE_THRESH,
- .dir = IIO_EV_DIR_RISING | IIO_EV_DIR_FALLING,
+ .dir = IIO_EV_DIR_EITHER,
.mask_separate = BIT(IIO_EV_INFO_VALUE) |
BIT(IIO_EV_INFO_ENABLE) |
BIT(IIO_EV_INFO_PERIOD)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html