4.19-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. ------------------ From: Chengguang Xu <cgxu519@xxxxxxxxxxx> [ Upstream commit 05848db2083d4f232e84e385845dcd98d5c511b2 ] It is meaningless to increase DQST_LOOKUPS number while iterating over dirty/inuse list, so just avoid it. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190926083408.4269-1-cgxu519@xxxxxxxxxxx Signed-off-by: Chengguang Xu <cgxu519@xxxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx> Stable-dep-of: dabc8b207566 ("quota: fix dqput() to follow the guarantees dquot_srcu should provide") Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx> --- fs/quota/dquot.c | 2 -- 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/quota/dquot.c b/fs/quota/dquot.c index 01bec330d54b1..50aaa5b0706e8 100644 --- a/fs/quota/dquot.c +++ b/fs/quota/dquot.c @@ -594,7 +594,6 @@ int dquot_scan_active(struct super_block *sb, /* Now we have active dquot so we can just increase use count */ atomic_inc(&dquot->dq_count); spin_unlock(&dq_list_lock); - dqstats_inc(DQST_LOOKUPS); dqput(old_dquot); old_dquot = dquot; /* @@ -649,7 +648,6 @@ int dquot_writeback_dquots(struct super_block *sb, int type) * use count */ dqgrab(dquot); spin_unlock(&dq_list_lock); - dqstats_inc(DQST_LOOKUPS); err = sb->dq_op->write_dquot(dquot); if (err) { /* -- 2.40.1
