6.1-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. ------------------ From: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@xxxxxxxxxx> [ Upstream commit 8936bf53a091ad6a34b480c22002f1cb2422ab38 ] Commit df8fc4e934c1 ("kbuild: Enable -fstrict-flex-arrays=3") started applying strict rules to standard string functions. It does not work well with conventional socket code around each protocol- specific sockaddr_XXX struct, which is cast from sockaddr_storage and has a bigger size than fortified functions expect. See these commits: commit 06d4c8a80836 ("af_unix: Fix fortify_panic() in unix_bind_bsd().") commit ecb4534b6a1c ("af_unix: Terminate sun_path when bind()ing pathname socket.") commit a0ade8404c3b ("af_packet: Fix warning of fortified memcpy() in packet_getname().") We must cast the protocol-specific address back to sockaddr_storage to call such functions. However, in the case of getsockaddr(SO_PEERNAME), the rationale is a bit unclear as the buffer is defined by char[128] which is the same size as sockaddr_storage. Let's use sockaddr_storage explicitly. Signed-off-by: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@xxxxxxxxxx> Reviewed-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@xxxxxxxxxx> Reviewed-by: Willem de Bruijn <willemb@xxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx> --- net/core/sock.c | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/net/core/sock.c b/net/core/sock.c index e5858fa5d6d57..0ee2e33bbe5f8 100644 --- a/net/core/sock.c +++ b/net/core/sock.c @@ -1774,14 +1774,14 @@ int sk_getsockopt(struct sock *sk, int level, int optname, case SO_PEERNAME: { - char address[128]; + struct sockaddr_storage address; - lv = sock->ops->getname(sock, (struct sockaddr *)address, 2); + lv = sock->ops->getname(sock, (struct sockaddr *)&address, 2); if (lv < 0) return -ENOTCONN; if (lv < len) return -EINVAL; - if (copy_to_sockptr(optval, address, len)) + if (copy_to_sockptr(optval, &address, len)) return -EFAULT; goto lenout; } -- 2.40.1