5.15-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. ------------------ From: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@xxxxxxxxxx> [ Upstream commit de02f2ac5d8cfb311f44f2bf144cc20002f1fbbd ] Do not allow to probe on "__cfi_" or "__pfx_" started symbol, because those are used for CFI and not executed. Probing it will break the CFI. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/168904024679.116016.18089228029322008512.stgit@devnote2/ Signed-off-by: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@xxxxxxxxxx> Reviewed-by: Steven Rostedt (Google) <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx> --- kernel/kprobes.c | 14 +++++++++++++- 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/kernel/kprobes.c b/kernel/kprobes.c index 7e9fa1b7ff671..6cf561322bbe6 100644 --- a/kernel/kprobes.c +++ b/kernel/kprobes.c @@ -1545,6 +1545,17 @@ int __weak arch_check_ftrace_location(struct kprobe *p) return 0; } +static bool is_cfi_preamble_symbol(unsigned long addr) +{ + char symbuf[KSYM_NAME_LEN]; + + if (lookup_symbol_name(addr, symbuf)) + return false; + + return str_has_prefix("__cfi_", symbuf) || + str_has_prefix("__pfx_", symbuf); +} + static int check_kprobe_address_safe(struct kprobe *p, struct module **probed_mod) { @@ -1563,7 +1574,8 @@ static int check_kprobe_address_safe(struct kprobe *p, within_kprobe_blacklist((unsigned long) p->addr) || jump_label_text_reserved(p->addr, p->addr) || static_call_text_reserved(p->addr, p->addr) || - find_bug((unsigned long)p->addr)) { + find_bug((unsigned long)p->addr) || + is_cfi_preamble_symbol((unsigned long)p->addr)) { ret = -EINVAL; goto out; } -- 2.40.1
