6.5-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Katya Orlova <e.orlova@xxxxxxxxx>
[ Upstream commit efc0b0bcffcba60d9c6301063d25a22a4744b499 ]
In addition to the EINVAL, there may be an ENOMEM.
Found by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with SVACE.
Fixes: 70431bfd825d ("cifs: Support fscache indexing rewrite")
Signed-off-by: Katya Orlova <e.orlova@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Steve French <stfrench@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
fs/smb/client/fscache.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/fs/smb/client/fscache.c b/fs/smb/client/fscache.c
index 8f6909d633da8..34e20c4cd507f 100644
--- a/fs/smb/client/fscache.c
+++ b/fs/smb/client/fscache.c
@@ -48,7 +48,7 @@ int cifs_fscache_get_super_cookie(struct cifs_tcon *tcon)
sharename = extract_sharename(tcon->tree_name);
if (IS_ERR(sharename)) {
cifs_dbg(FYI, "%s: couldn't extract sharename\n", __func__);
- return -EINVAL;
+ return PTR_ERR(sharename);
}
slen = strlen(sharename);
--
2.40.1
